<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If the president could respond with candor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dailytrojan.com/2009/10/22/if-the-president-could-respond-with-candor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dailytrojan.com/2009/10/22/if-the-president-could-respond-with-candor/</link>
	<description>University of Southern California</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:14:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Clark</title>
		<link>http://dailytrojan.com/2009/10/22/if-the-president-could-respond-with-candor/comment-page-1/#comment-839</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailytrojan.com/?p=4053#comment-839</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I love it when liberal writers daydream about being Obama and what would they say if they were him, but I like it because it&#039;s ridiculous and makes the writer look like an idiot. Which may not be what you were aiming for. A better way to respond to this story would be to come up with a list of your own humorous reasons why people hate Obama. For example, one of the great conservative political humorists on the web came up with this one: http://www.imao.us/index.php/2009/10/why-people-hate-barack-obama/&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My favorite: &quot;He DIDN’T really caboose-check that Brazillian chick. Is he a freakin’ eunuch?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love it when liberal writers daydream about being Obama and what would they say if they were him, but I like it because it&#8217;s ridiculous and makes the writer look like an idiot. Which may not be what you were aiming for. A better way to respond to this story would be to come up with a list of your own humorous reasons why people hate Obama. For example, one of the great conservative political humorists on the web came up with this one: <a href="http://www.imao.us/index.php/2009/10/why-people-hate-barack-obama/" rel="nofollow">http://www.imao.us/index.php/2009/10/why-people-hate-barack-obama/</a></p>
<p>My favorite: &#8220;He DIDN’T really caboose-check that Brazillian chick. Is he a freakin’ eunuch?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Coulter</title>
		<link>http://dailytrojan.com/2009/10/22/if-the-president-could-respond-with-candor/comment-page-1/#comment-751</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Coulter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailytrojan.com/?p=4053#comment-751</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;B. Hussein Obama!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>B. Hussein Obama!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane</title>
		<link>http://dailytrojan.com/2009/10/22/if-the-president-could-respond-with-candor/comment-page-1/#comment-748</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailytrojan.com/?p=4053#comment-748</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Okay, Robert. Now do the same for President Bush. Because liberals still get all foamy-at-the-mouth about their hatred for him, but every single decision for which he is criticized has a calm and rational answer... even if you don&#039;t agree with the answers. Even if the answers are fantasy/wrong/lies -- even as some of Obama&#039;s &quot;answers&quot; you wrote, above, clearly are wrong, misguided, or deceitful.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, Robert. Now do the same for President Bush. Because liberals still get all foamy-at-the-mouth about their hatred for him, but every single decision for which he is criticized has a calm and rational answer&#8230; even if you don&#8217;t agree with the answers. Even if the answers are fantasy/wrong/lies &#8212; even as some of Obama&#8217;s &#8220;answers&#8221; you wrote, above, clearly are wrong, misguided, or deceitful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://dailytrojan.com/2009/10/22/if-the-president-could-respond-with-candor/comment-page-1/#comment-742</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailytrojan.com/?p=4053#comment-742</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Brilliantly refreshing piece of rationality here. What I wouldn&#039;t give for this situation to actually occur.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliantly refreshing piece of rationality here. What I wouldn&#8217;t give for this situation to actually occur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 311/312 objects using disk: basic

Served from: dailytrojan.com @ 2012-02-11 21:10:16 -->
