<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blame Internet and scavengers for invasion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dailytrojan.com/2009/11/02/blame-internet-and-scavengers-for-invasion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dailytrojan.com/2009/11/02/blame-internet-and-scavengers-for-invasion/</link>
	<description>University of Southern California</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 14:42:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dylan Kay</title>
		<link>http://dailytrojan.com/2009/11/02/blame-internet-and-scavengers-for-invasion/comment-page-1/#comment-1105</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan Kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailytrojan.com/?p=4547#comment-1105</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, unlocked doors. Fascinating. Even I have an alarm system…
But anywhoo, I don’t understand why tabloids even exist. I know this article is mainly using that as a point to explain the down side to the internet, but what really got me is that “entertainment news outlets are furiously tugging and pulling at celebrities’ daily lives to put out content.” I can’t see how anyone can stalk someone just to put out a quick article. Everyone knows off the top of their heads that they’re mostly lies put together like a soap opera where unbelievably dramatic scandals happen in broad daylight, but I can’t see how someone can base their career on merely digging up all the dirt on celebs. Hmm, I guess this is what I want to say, get a life folks. I wonder if gossip magazines (or gossip blogs at that) didn’t exist, would people be more apt to make changes in their own lives?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, unlocked doors. Fascinating. Even I have an alarm system…<br />
But anywhoo, I don’t understand why tabloids even exist. I know this article is mainly using that as a point to explain the down side to the internet, but what really got me is that “entertainment news outlets are furiously tugging and pulling at celebrities’ daily lives to put out content.” I can’t see how anyone can stalk someone just to put out a quick article. Everyone knows off the top of their heads that they’re mostly lies put together like a soap opera where unbelievably dramatic scandals happen in broad daylight, but I can’t see how someone can base their career on merely digging up all the dirt on celebs. Hmm, I guess this is what I want to say, get a life folks. I wonder if gossip magazines (or gossip blogs at that) didn’t exist, would people be more apt to make changes in their own lives?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/4 queries in 0.002 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 256/256 objects using disk: basic

Served from: dailytrojan.com @ 2012-05-24 08:15:14 -->
