Stopping will curb cyberbullying

After the suicide of Hannah Smith, a 14-year-old teenager from Leicestershire, England, it is time to step in and regulate websites such as that allow hateful, anonymous postings.

Mollie Berg | Daily Trojan

Mollie Berg | Daily Trojan


Smith was a regular user of this social network  according to CNN, as she was allegedly using it to seek advice on the skin condition, eczema. Smith’s innocent intentions were met by cruel responses: On Aug. 2, Smith’s 16-year-old sister Jo reportedly discovered that Smith had hanged herself. In order to protect our youth from a similar fate, government intervention is needed to stop

In today’s world where advanced technology has become the center of everyday life, traditional school hallway bullying has manifested itself in a new niche within the Internet.

Social networking websites are online hubs crawling with countless teens interacting with each other freely, and user rates skyrocketing by the minute. is a website on which users create profiles for themselves and accept anonymous questions and comments to their profile. It has 70 million users worldwide, half of whom are under 18, and gains nearly 200,000 new users daily.

The Q-and-A-style site allows users to anonymously ask other users questions, which can then be publicly posted to the profile. While the site was probably founded with intentions of being a fun and easygoing medium, this is rarely the experiences of teen users. promotes hateful, psychologically scarring interactions with its anonymous asker feature, which self-conscious adolescents find themselves hooked on in search of confidence. These fragile teens are more often than not met with shallow questions and comments ranging from, “Are you a virgin?” to “You are ugly and annoying,” to “You are fat.” They will sign on to their accounts to find their question inboxes flooded with posts such as “Everyone hates you.”

Smith’s death has fueled mounting calls in Britain for preventative action against abuse through social media that started when widespread reports of women receiving rape and bomb threats via Twitter began piling up. An online petition urging the government to act following the despondent teen’s death has now reached more than 10,000 signatures, and Prime Minister David Cameron has even called for the establishment of a commission to review the responsibilities of social networking site managers and draft a range of preventative action possibilities.

But even with these increasing pressures, cyberbullying continues to plague the Internet. The truth of the matter is that it is too difficult for emotionally unstable teens to stay away from these hateful words or even turn off their computers. As teen users choose to publicly post these questions and their answers to their profiles, either responding in agreement or retaliating with some sort of witty comeback, they unintentionally propagate self-hate and further injure themselves. Many teens even continue to publicize their accounts on their other social networking profiles in search of more opinions, spurring an endless cycle. Abuse through social networking sites is threatening our youth, and it is urgent that government action is taken to shut down and similar sites in order to put an end to the hatred circulating online.

According to The Guardian, has pledged cyberbullying reform through increased user protection following Smith’s death. The company has planned to modify policies regarding reporting and moderation, registration and corporate visibility. Unless the site decides to remove its anonymous user feature completely, however, mere reporting reforms will be ultimately useless in putting a stop to cyberbullying.

Though considerations like Cameron’s commission to investigate possibilities such as adding a “red button” to social networking sites, which flags out experiencers of cyberbullying to guidance counselors, are steps in the right direction, the fact that the Internet lacks transparency makes such approaches futile in the war against online abuse.

With endless opportunities for bullying through anonymity, if the Internet does not see any kind of serious government intervention in the near future, cyberbullies will continue to sit behind their keyboards trolling social network sites and posting the cruelest and nastiest comments left and right. According to the Pew Research Center, 93 percent of teens ages 12 to 17 are active on the Internet several times a day. Since the most fragile age group is also the most frequently online, today’s adolescents are at an even more grave risk than ever of experiencing severe psychological scarring with the imminent possibility of consequent physical harm.

The sooner and similar sites are eradicated, and stringent regulation of other social network sites occurs, the sooner our youth are protected from the swarm of cyberbullies driving fragile teens into an abyss of trauma.


Rojine Ariani is a sophomore majoring in political science and international relations.

Follow Rojine Ariani on Twitter @rojineariani

11 replies
  1. latestheartbreak
    latestheartbreak says:

    It’s really sad that young teens are committing suicide due to bullying, but this website is not to blame. Users can block IP addresses from sending them questions, and if bullying continues and users are not getting anything positive from the site, they can close their accounts. I find it quite odd that people are blaming for suicides when users have the full capability of pressing the “deactivate my account” button.

  2. crrodriguez
    crrodriguez says:

    Shame on you for promoting censorship and political control over private business, you might want to try Saudi arabia or Cuba if you want to live in a society that supports your train of thought.

  3. Ash Kaddoura
    Ash Kaddoura says:

    Frankly, this suggestion is rediculous. It’s a simple question and answer site where the purpose is anonymity. Hanna make an account knowing perfectly well that people could say what they wanted. Is it horrible she committed suicide? Yes! Does that mean we need to shut down a site just because of an anonymous button? I think not.

    • Exactamundo
      Exactamundo says:

      Give me a break. Fragile teens? A bunch of teens killed a man in Washington. Teens live in the same reality as adults. For most people life is a brutal contact sport. Training teens to expect a world of asspats for life is doing them the biggest possible disservice.

  4. Natasha
    Natasha says:

    Regulate the site for 18+, myself and everyfriend I have, have many of us have gotten abuse, but it’s anonymous it doesn’t bother me. If my site was filled with it i’d just refrain from using it. It’s actually ridiculous trying to put the blame onto a site, the real problem is the lack of control and regular checks made on minors their parents should be monitoring their internet activities and if anything comes up as a problem? Block the webpage, easily done. Bullying in school is far worse than insults from the nameless.

  5. Anon
    Anon says:

    What a poorly written opinion piece. Rojine’s claims are unfounded and overly simplified. Just like my comment.

  6. Bren
    Bren says:

    There just needs to be more done to stop the excessive amount of bullying. Libel, bullying, defamation, and stalking are not censorship. They are not even protected speech. That needs to change. I have to say in the United States, the worst offender is Topix though. They don’t even make their users register. It is pure filth.

  7. Ellen Ridlei
    Ellen Ridlei says:

    I can’t believe that companies like (T.D. FORD – SCOTIA BANK – COTTONELLE – EXPRESS etc…) all support this web-site. How you as large companies support this, is beyond comprehension. Your advertising on a web-site will not increase your company sales. These are “KIDS” not people who buy a cars, get a mortgage etc… They are kids who are hiding behind this anonymous they are allowed to hide behind by – needs to remove allowing to be anonymous and I think they’ll see a good part of the bullying go away. This is empowering these kids to bullying other kids, to the point of sometimes being a part of a young person taking their lives. This so called net work is suppose to be the way of our future – instead sites like are causing lives of our young people to taken way! The government needs to step in and start controlling these sites with regulations. You can be charged if you assist a person dying of cancer in taking their life – so why aren’t people be charged for bullying people into taking their lives?

  8. ask fm user
    ask fm user says:

    i dont think thay should shut askfm down but thay defenetly should have a report button and should stop the anon questions

  9. Gina
    Gina says:

    I wish they would get rid of this website. My daughter was bullied this weekend and it broke my heart, after she saw what they said about her she wanted to move schools and said she wanted to sleep forever. It’s a terrible site because anybody can put nasty things about you and it doesn’t have to be from someone you know it can be from someone anonymous.

Comments are closed.