Fox News slipup brings issue of military sexism to the forefront


Once again, a Fox News host has made an insensitive remark on air, leading to national outrage. This time, however, it is not just average citizens who are upset; members of the U.S. military are also furious. Last week, Fox News host Eric Bolling referred to the United Arab Emirates’ first female fighter pilot, Mariam Al Mansouri, as “boobs on the ground” because she is a woman. Not only did Bolling make a ridiculously sexist comment, but his colleague, Greg Gutfield, also made a joke about Al Mansouri’s inability to park her aircraft because she is a woman. “After she bombed it, she couldn’t park it,” Gutfeld said.

In response to Bolling’s comments, Fox News began receiving letters from viewers, including the military, chastising him for his insensitivity. According to New York Magazine, Bolling apologized, saying, “I’m sorry for what I said. I believe that Major Al Mansouri is a hero. She’s courageous, brave and she deserves our praise and not inappropriate jokes. She has my admiration and my very, very sincere gratitude.” Gutfield, however, did not directly apologize for his comment. Instead, he quipped that viewers should know he “makes very hacky jokes knowing that they are hacky.” On top of that, he added, “And of course, women in the UAE can drive. That’s the real joke …They can drive, and I can’t. I don’t even have a driver’s license.” It’s an understatement to characterize these comments as upsetting.

According to New York Magazine, male and female American veterans involved with the Truman Project wrote an open letter to Bolling and Gutfield in which they said the hosts’ remarks about Al Mansouri were “unwarranted, offensive, and fundamentally opposed to what the military taught [them] to stand for,” and that the attitudes expressed by these two might potentially weaken the fight against ISIS.

“We need to send a clear message that anyone, male or female, who will stand up to ISIS and get the job done is worthy of our respect and gratitude,” read the open letter.

With this outrage from the military, however, questions of sexism’s portrayal in the military arise. There has always been an inclination to deny women the right to serve in the military, as evidenced by the years of struggle it took for them to finally be allowed into the military. Because of the stereotype that women cannot handle the physical and emotional rigor of the military, a culture of sexism has arisen within the ranks, despite the best efforts of those trying to combat it. According to USA Today, the struggle to make sexism equivalent to that of racial slurs has been in progress for almost two years. The permissive environment that has been created, however, seems to have trickled down to even the military academies where, if such issues are not dealt with soon, the culture of sexism within the military will only get worse.

According to Time, the Pentagon found this year that sexism is routine in military academies. In fact, there have been incidents at West Point and the Air Force involving documents or emails that were offensive to women, and apparently, “many students at the academies see sexual assault and crude behavior as an almost accepted part of their academy experience.” For some people, though, the experience of programs similar to Reserve Officers’ Training Corps in college was better than in high school.

According to the Harvard Crimson, Carolyn F. Pushaw, one of the university’s Naval ROTC students, said that when she was in high school, she took part in a military-style program that was not connected to ROTC. She found it to be a somewhat negative experience.

“There was surprisingly a lot of sexism,” Pushaw said. Pushaw also “found that in ROTC it’s a lot more equal.” While everyone’s experience in ROTC or the military academies might be different, there could very well be a correlation of differences in regards to the amount of sexism displayed in ROTC as compared to military academies.

Though Fox News failed in an attempt to convey the news because of the network’s misogynistic and insensitive comments, the need to address sexism in the military is essential. The comments are a reminder that the media is not the only breeding ground for sexism. The lift of the ban on women to serve on the front lines last year has been a step in the right direction for gender equality, but there is still a long way to go. Hopefully, with stricter programs cracking down on gender inequality and sexism within the military, the institution can continue to grow positively and continue being the incredible force that valiantly serves this country so selflessly, to which we are all thankful for. As Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta said in regard to women who are allowed to serve on the front lines, it is “the responsibility of every citizen to protect the nation.” The need to respect women has never been more crucial.

 

Chelsea Hernandez is a senior majoring in English (creative writing). Her column, “Foot in Mouth,” runs Wednesdays.

 

4 replies
  1. Tommy T
    Tommy T says:

    It is very intriguing to read the comments on every non-conservative opinion post on the Daily Trojan. The same self victimization the machismo conservatives claim to hate is pouring into each of these articles. It baffles me to see people sympathize with sexist comments because chastising ignorance, “has ruined much of the freedom of expression us adults grew up having.”

    Chelsea, please stop “Chasing Equality.” You risk to ruin white male privilege. ;)

  2. Thekatman
    Thekatman says:

    It seems the DT censored and removed my two other comment postings, having to do with the hate speech by Cal muslim students against jews, and calling for the murder of jewish folks. Seems the DT and the university have their opinions pointed in the wrong direction.

  3. Benjamin Roberts
    Benjamin Roberts says:

    Chelsea… Unfortunately your support for women and “gender equality” is completely overshadowed by your apparent disdain for Fox News… not to mention your ignorance in not understanding the difference between a news broadcast and a news-opinion show. For the record, I’m not exactly delighted by the comment made by Bolling, but he was not anchoring a news broadcast. As a previous reader noted, it’s a program called “The Five”, a deliberately opinionated program where the hosts, and their guests, express THEIR opinions on the news and current events. Such programs exist on all the news channels (MSNBC, CNN, etc), not just Fox News. The rhetoric on such shows swings from serious to comical purposely, and is intended to engage and stir debate. I would submit that even hosts of programs like that should be careful and judicious in their commentary, but it is wholly unfair and incorrect to state (as you did in your article) that they represent the “network’s misogynistic and insensitive” point of view. Again, your hate for the network was more clearly conveyed than the rest of this somewhat feeble article.

    Second… I’d like to share a truth with you and anyone else reading: STOP CHASING EQUALITY. It’s the wrong goal. Instead, CHASE FAIRNESS. They’re not the same and shouldn’t be because things in nature are rarely equal. Men and women (for example) are so very different, and bring so many different and wonderful things to life that are unique to each gender. We should celebrate and embrace the differences. Rather than the constant push for all things to be equal, we should seek to make things fair. Sometimes that will result in things being equal, and sometimes it won’t.

    Finally… As you are a senior majoring in English, I’m alarmed at some of the clumsiness in your writing. For example: “… to which we are all thankful for” might read more correctly as “for which we are all thankful”. I know it sounds harsh, but as you get older you will discover that your argument (weak or strong) will be better received when articulated well.

  4. Thekatman
    Thekatman says:

    Chelsea, van you repost your commentary about the MSNBC hosts who’ve been fired or not for her vulgar comments about politically Conservative women, the statements about Sarah Palin, the filth of the liberal view on late term abortions, etc?

    Bolling’s statement in jest and he apologised. Gutted doesn’t need to apologize just because some emotionally sensitive twits got their feelings hurt. He’s a jokester and anyone who watches The Five or his evening show know that.

    It’s unfortunate, that the western world has had to force us into a PC world. It has done nothing but ruin much of the freedom of expression us adults grew up having.

    Why hasn’t the DT staff written an article about the hateful demonstration that the Muslim students and their advisors held on the UC Berkeley campus the other day calling for the death of Jews and the destruction of Israel?

    You kids are missing the point about a lot of serious events going on in the world. So sweating the small stuff and focus on the destruction of male global cities due to the acceptance of a multicultural society. See Brussels, Paris, London, Dearborn MI, Soon NYC.
    Geez.

Comments are closed.