College Republicans host controversial speaker Milo Yiannopoulos


Milo Yiannopoulos, a controversial British technology and media journalist and associate editor for the London office of Breitbart.com, spoke about the counterintuitive nature of safe spaces at universities and the false narrative surrounding sexual assault and rape culture on college campuses, among other topics, Wednesday night in Kaprielian Hall.

The event was hosted by the USC College Republicans.

Jacob Ellenhorn, president of USC GOP, spoke about the significance of bringing Yiannopoulos to campus.

“He’s kind of been someone that I’ve always been watching on the media, [and I’m a] personal fan of his,” Ellenhorn said. “I think it was important for him to come to campus because I feel free speech is constantly under attack, and it’s important to bring a diverse set of voices.”

The meeting, run in a Q&A format with Ellenhorn, began with the question of whether or not students should be made to feel comfortable on their own college campuses, specifically with safe spaces.

Yiannopoulos answered that what universities are really encouraging when they create “safe spaces” is the creation of places where opinions are harmful — places where words shape reality, a “preposterous” concept invented by the left.

“Words can’t change reality, but there’s a horrible trend on campuses that words can do harm to people,” Yiannopoulos said. “It’s a ridiculous, leftist assumption.”

Yiannopoulos argued that this “toxifying of certain opinions” assaults the First Amendment. He described the attempt to build “places for those terrified by words” as anti-intellectual and completely against the purpose of university because it insulates people from opinions due to potential trauma.

An example brought up was trigger warnings, which Yiannopoulos said is another “political weapon invented by the left.” Trigger warnings — stickers or disclaimers on textbooks, articles and other academic texts — would allow students to opt out from reading them if they contain content that might cause unfavorable, emotional responses.

Yiannopoulos argued that university is for the expansion of horizons, which would be impossible if students were able to put themselves on “privileged pedestals” where they could choose not to come into contact with what upsets them.

“My basic response to this is anyone who wants a trigger warning should be immediately expelled,” Yiannopoulos said. “They’ve demonstrated that they are incapable of completing requirements of their course. They’ve chosen to use slippery and unnecessary tactics based on dodgy cognitive science to suggest that people can’t be exposed to certain ideas because they’re so hurtful or traumatic. All of this is nonsense.”

The next conversation was about the “real” internet war — not between conservatives and liberals, but between authoritarians and libertarians. Yiannopoulos argued that the general impression is that if a person is a conservative online, a liberal will find a way to illegitimately write him or her off because the left wants to control what people consume and communicate publicly.

Yiannopoulos’ incendiary language has recently drawn media attention. Last Saturday, Yiannopoulos and Rebel Media broadcaster Lauren Southern were both thrown out of the downtown Los Angeles Amber Rose SlutWalk, a movement calling for an end to rape culture, after holding up signs such as, “Regret is Not Rape” and “Rape Culture and Harry Potter: Both Fantasy.”

Yiannopoulos claimed the premise of the SlutWalk was lunacy and that the organizers of the event called the police because that is “what authoritarians do when they find they can’t win in the marketplace of ideas.”

Yiannopoulos noted a conversation with a few of the women attending the LA SlutWalk.

“[I asked], how has sexual assault personally affected you,” Yiannopoulos said. “[And she responded], ‘I can’t walk down the street without being harassed.’ It’s like, really? You’re 300 pounds. Who are you trying to kid? [Another women said], ‘My clothes should not make me a sexual object of men’s attention.’ You’re in nipple tassels. Obviously, you want to have sex with somebody.”

He went on to argue against the existence of the gender wage gap and the “rubbish” sexual assault statistics on college campuses. For the latter, Yiannopoulos said that these “1-in-5-women-type rape statistics” have wrongly become accepted truths and that rape culture at universities does not exist.

Yiannopoulos responded to a question about the lack of women in science and technology by saying that the difference was due to a statistical difference in the IQs of men and women. Women, Yiannopoulos said, tend to have IQs that cluster around the mean, while men’s tend toward the extremes of the distribution.

“More men have higher IQs, when you run the numbers, the higher someone’s IQ, the more likely it is that they’re a man,” he said.

While he acknowledged that there was disagreement among scientists over the efficacy of IQ as a measure of intelligence, he argued that success in STEM fields correlates strongly with high IQ.

“Most of the differences in STEM aren’t because men are sexist, they aren’t the result of sinister patriarchal forces, they’re not the result of stereotypes,” he said.

Regarding his provocative nature, Yiannopoulos defined his journalistic role as being a voice for those without a platform, specifically those with conservative ideology. It was a role he recognized as pitting himself against much of mainstream media and belief.

“I like big challenges,” he said. “I’m not scared of feminists, I’m not scared of progressives. I’m not scared of these people. I see them doing a huge amount of damage, and if I can help where other people can’t or won’t, then I’d love to.”

40 replies
  1. Vanir
    Vanir says:

    Here’s hoping for a world without Milo Yiannopoulos… or other lying, women-hating monsters like him. The sooner the better.

      • Vanir
        Vanir says:

        Actually getting rid of people with the wrong mindset (or physical characteristics) is a thing for your political side – not mine. I simply look forward to when his mindset, his misogyny, his contempt for social progress, is only found in the history books – and ONLY there.

        • TRIGGERED!
          TRIGGERED! says:

          Actually, the Marxism on which your Social Justice cult is based “got rid” of about 100 million people. The only thing you’re good at, to be honest. Your pathetic attempts to silence people by screaming “misogynist” at them is not particularly impressive – more like pitiful. It’s rather obvious that you couldn’t win an actual debate.

          • Vanir
            Vanir says:

            “Misogynist” is simply an objective description of a person’s based on his or hers ideas regarding a group of people. Same as “racist” or “bigot”, – or any other words that neoreactionaries find so annoying because they accurately describe them.

            Also. I don’t think you should accuse others of using words to “silence” people, while defending a man who tries to shame women from speaking on serious issues, based on their size or clothes. At least if you want any pretense of there being coherent logic behind your ideas (i.e. unless you want yourself revealed for the double standard spewing hypocrite you are).

          • TRIGGERED!
            TRIGGERED! says:

            “”Misogynist” is simply an objective description of a person’s based on his or hers ideas regarding a group of people. ”

            Before trying to pretend that the hateful labels you fling at people are ‘objective’, perhaps you should overcome the more basic challenge of writing properly. Or don’t they teach you that in Gender Studies?

            ” Same as “racist” or “bigot”, – or any other words that neoreactionaries find so annoying because they accurately describe them.”

            Not really. You know a screeching, blue-haired SJW is losing a debate when he starts screaming “bigot” or “reactionary” at you. Which is always, because you never have any arguments.

            ” while defending a man who tries to shame women from speaking on serious issues, based on their size or clothes.”

            On their size? You mean height? No, of course not, you mean morbid obesity, the kind that is extremely dangerous to people’s health. You know, people die because the likes of you keep encouraging them to be unhealthy and obese, instead of telling them the hard truth that being fat is unhealthy.

            And no, if you’re 300 pounds, only chubby-chasing SJW ‘men’ will be interested in you. Yeah, you’re not going to convince me that anyone is cat-calling you.

  2. RexCelestis
    RexCelestis says:

    “My basic response to this is anyone who wants a trigger warning should be immediately expelled,” Yiannopoulos said.

    [Sarcasm] No, that doesn’t sound authoritarian at all. Real champion of free speech there.[/Sarcasm]

    I get the feeling that Milo doesn’t understand the concept of “safe places.” There are not places designed to suppress opinions and discussion, but rather to allow such without fear of personal attack. They are to encourage conversation by providing safe forums for those usually excluded.

    • TRIGGERED!
      TRIGGERED! says:

      I think he knows better than you what safe space policies entail, as he has been the victim of one.

      After barring Julie Bindel from a debate on censorship planned for mid-October, the Students’ Union have now told Milo Yiannopoulos that he is also prohibited from attending

      In their initial statement the Students’ Union Executive Team rejected Bindel on the grounds that her appearance would be “potentially in breach of [the] safe space policy.”

      • RexCelestis
        RexCelestis says:

        I’m not saying that all safe spaces are all executed well. What they are supposed to be and how they are realized often differ.

        Being a victim of a safe space? I think such an exclusion represents a lack of trust and faith that someone can participate in a meaningful discussion. There’s nothing that I’ve read from Milo that would indicate to me that he could add to a conversation.

        He’s only a victim of his own inability to participate and articulate his thoughts in a tactful and non-inflammatory manner, as far as I’m concerned.

        • TRIGGERED!
          TRIGGERED! says:

          ” I think such an exclusion represents a lack of trust and faith that someone can participate in a meaningful discussion.”

          You just claimed that “safe spaces” are not intended to suppress opinion and discussion. Then you admit that they are designed to do exactly that.

          Trigger warnings and safe spaces are indications that someone is not fit for college, which after all is about inquiry, not indoctrination. At least, it’s supposed to be.

          • RexCelestis
            RexCelestis says:

            huh?

            “You just claimed that “safe spaces” are not intended to suppress opinion and discussion. Then you admit that they are designed to do exactly that.”

            Not at all. Safe spaces are designed to foster opinion and discussion. That means all the participants need to be able to have a reasonable discourse. With statements like “You’re 300 pounds. Who are you trying to kid?” or “More men have higher IQs” I certainly wouldn’t trust Milo to contribute in a meaningful way without the conversation turning toxic.

            There are ways to discuss this topics and there are important things to say about them. Milo doesn’t seem to understand how to talk about this stuff. If I wanted to have a serious conversation, he’s not someone I would invite.

          • TRIGGERED!
            TRIGGERED! says:

            ” Safe spaces are designed to foster opinion and discussion. ”

            Yeah, the opinions of radical feminists who attack scientists for wearing a shirt, while silencing anyone who disagrees with these people.

            “I certainly wouldn’t trust Milo to contribute in a meaningful way without the conversation turning toxic.”

            Well, you certainly can’t trust Milo to adhere to your feminist “fat acceptance” movement, or their pseudo-scientific claims that everything is a social construct. That is why you want to silence him.

            ” If I wanted to have a serious conversation, he’s not someone I would invite.”

            That is because you are not actually interested in a conversation, hence your attempts to silence anyone who disagrees with your Social Justice agenda.

          • RexCelestis
            RexCelestis says:

            Some very interesting interpretations of my thoughts. Not correct. But interesting.

            Let’s face it. The internet is not a “Safe Space.” There were plenty of people talking about the shirt and many terrible things said by more than a few. That’s why we need “safe spaces.” So that we can have tough conversations without fear of attack.

            I have no desire to silence Milo. He can talk all he wants, just as people can refuse or decide provide him a forum. I just wouldn’t expect to have a serious conversation about these issues with him. I am happy to engage with people of differing opinions provided the conversation doesn’t turn personal (as this one is starting to). Differing opinions open my eyes to new ideas and push me to expand my own boundaries. I actually go and seek them out, professionally and personally.

            But I really want to have a civil conversation, where people debate ideas with facts and well constructed arguments instead of put downs and other personal attacks.

            Let’s look at this statement.

            “That is because you are not actually interested in a conversation, hence your attempts to silence anyone who disagrees with your Social Justice agenda.”

            Unless you have telepathy, you really can’t tell me what I’m interested in. If you do have telepathy, then it’s not working very well. Reading a statement like that pretty much shuts down any additional conversation. I’ve been cast as an SJW who won’t listen to reason. Let’s not mention that I personally identify as a Social Justice Rogue and that I really haven’t seen an reason or well constructed arguments in this thread.

            I’ll be bowing out of this conversation, now.

          • TRIGGERED!
            TRIGGERED! says:

            “There were plenty of people talking about the shirt and many terrible things said by more than a few. That’s why we need “safe spaces.” So that we can have tough conversations without fear of attack.”

            You need safe spaces, because otherwise, you can’t attack scientists without people criticizing you? Sounds about right. You want to call people every name in the book, but you don’t want to be held accountable for your hatred.

            “I have no desire to silence Milo.”

            You just endorsed a Student Union banning him from participating in a university debate, because you believe in “Safe Spaces” where special snowflakes can’t be criticized.

            “But I really want to have a civil conversation, where people debate ideas with facts and well constructed arguments instead of put downs and other personal attacks.”

            You might want to look at your own side, because it constantly engages in personal attacks against people who disagree with them.

            “Unless you have telepathy, you really can’t tell me what I’m interested in.”

            I can base it on the opinions you have voiced here, and since you have advocated silencing people who disagree with you, it’s pretty obvious to me that you are not interested in having a conversation, except with people who already agree with you.

            ” Let’s not mention that I personally identify as a Social Justice Rogue”

            That’s sad.

  3. Lop Treadmill
    Lop Treadmill says:

    Milo is my gay savior. I just wish I was a young hung gay black man. Unfortunately I’m neither.

    • TRIGGERED!
      TRIGGERED! says:

      If anyone wondered, yes, this guy is a fan of the notorious con artist and liar Anita Sarkeesian.

      Talking about professional shittalkers.

  4. John Wallace
    John Wallace says:

    So people support a guy who called Laverne Cox a man, tried to claim Shaun King was white based on the word of Joshua Goldberg, and said “if you’ve heard about a rape, it’s fake.”

    That’s not “conservative.” That’s being a horrid little cretin.

    • TRIGGERED!
      TRIGGERED! says:

      Hahaha, after so many far-leftists have been blown out of the water by claiming that Shaun King being white had anything to do with Joshua Goldberg, they keep repeating the claim.

      You really are like creationists. Except even more intellectually dishonest.

      Shaun King is white. Get over it. His mom didn’t cheat on a random guy he knows nothing about, other than that he’s black. That’s absurd.

        • Lop Treadmill
          Lop Treadmill says:

          Riigght, because anyone who disagrees must be one of those horrid gamers. You pathetic losers see the whole world through your victim lens. Keep bending over and crying to your mommies, but don’t be surprised when nobody gives you your blankie.

          • TRIGGERED!
            TRIGGERED! says:

            Take it from the avid gamer Florence, the self-proclaimed “Social Justice Paladin” (white knight) who spends most of his time playing Depression Quest.

          • Florence
            Florence says:

            Actually, Florence, the self-proclaimed “Social Justice Paladin” (more of a silvery grey knight, really) spends most of her time playing Western RPGs like the Shadowrun series. She is also fond of Majesty: The Fantasy Kingdom Sim, though she wishes that Majesty 2, with its superior gameplay, had the custom map feature of the original game, and that the Kingmaker and Battles of Ardania expansions didn’t suck so much. She also enjoys Starcraft 2, but her computer is kind of shit right now, since her good one died. She has not, in fact, played Depression Quest, but also does not understand the irrational rage it induces from insecure male gamers, since the game isn’t even about feminism, but surmises that it probably has something to do with their tiny joysticks.

          • TRIGGERED!
            TRIGGERED! says:

            ” She has not, in fact, played Depression Quest, but also does not understand the irrational rage it induces from insecure male gamers”

            So… you’re a misogynist who thinks that women are too stupid to see how dumb Depression Quest is? Rest assured that there are plenty who are brighter than you.

            “since the game isn’t even about feminism”

            Actually, it is. Most feminists are depressed, which is why they are so shrill and hateful.

            “but surmises that it probably has something to do with their tiny joysticks.”

            Brought to you by the ‘body acceptance’ and ‘obesity is healthy’ crowd. Oops.

          • Florence
            Florence says:

            Okay, seriously. Your trolling was fun at first, but at this point its just sad. You could at least TRY to keep up the facade of being serious. Ah well, was fun while it lasted! Social Justice Paladin, signing out!

  5. Moris Sarkisyan
    Moris Sarkisyan says:

    Milo is such a refreshing breath of air after all the drivel we usually here on campuses. Also I’m glad that USC allowed him to speak considering a few other unis have kicked him out.

  6. contemporaryIdealism
    contemporaryIdealism says:

    This whole article is full of crap and nothing on God’s green earth is going to make me think half of what this he is saying is true. I understand that he’s speaking his mind and being open, but what he’s saying is just straight up outlandish. Its all bullcrap.

  7. Shamednomore
    Shamednomore says:

    Thank you Milo for being a voice of reason. Hopefully more people will be emboldened to speak as openly and frankly as you.

Comments are closed.