Nostalgia is ruining our perceptions
By looking at old media with rose-colored glasses, we’re missing out on the present.
By looking at old media with rose-colored glasses, we’re missing out on the present.
I am perpetually looking back on the past with love and melancholy. I am deeply nostalgic to my very core. I know how easy it is to miss what we can never return to, even if the present is something I am enjoying, and even if the past I am reminiscing about was not particularly positive at the time.
I fear that this all-too-familiar nostalgia has a manipulative effect, urging us to believe that the past is somehow superior to the now — if not solely for the reason that we can never live in any moment more than once.
While this is something I have explored endlessly in my own perceptions and personal experiences, it is also something I have noticed with regard to our cultural consciousness. There seems to be a general disillusionment with art and media today — an underlying notion that we can never live up to the art of the past, that nothing can be as good as it was.
I disagree. I think this pessimistic view is just another way in which nostalgia rears her beautiful, ugly head. I draw your attention first to something generally familiar to members of Generation Z: Disney Channel.
On YouTube, TikTok and Instagram, discourse on the subject widely looks the same. It is generally agreed upon that Disney Channel has become “absolutely trash,” or at least that’s how one of the newest shows can be described in the eyes of TikTok user “@joeyschwartz39.” User “@_nianation_” agrees, writing “[Disney Channel] fell off in 1000 different ways.”
While some acknowledge that growing older may have something to do with the declining perception of the network, most argue that the new production is definitively worse.
Maybe there are real, objective reasons as to why the programming has gotten worse — or maybe we’ve merely aged out of its target demographic.
I personally don’t spend my time rewatching the shows I loved at 10 years old — not because I think the shows are bad, but because I know they won’t mean to me now what they meant to me then. I know it won’t be the same; my interests in media have grown and evolved as I have.
On a Reddit chain entitled “Did Disney channel really get bad, or did you grow up?” commenter “u/DiamondBurInTheRough’ wrote, “I still liked [old Disney Channel] for the sake of nostalgia, but if I saw the same show on ‘new Disney’, and didn’t have the connection with it from my childhood, I’d … think it was terrible.”
More so than missing the old Disney Channel, we miss the versions of ourselves that we were when we watched it; we miss wanting to watch Disney Channel at all. Maybe the quality of programming has genuinely worsened, but analyzing this as truly impartial is impossible when feelings of nostalgia are inextricable from our opinions.
The effects of nostalgia, however, are not limited merely to television or to children’s programming. Hollywood’s apparent obsession with rebooting old franchises is also a key consequence of romanticizing the past: see “Star Wars” (1977), “Rocky” (1976), “Jurassic Park” (1993), “Raiders of the Lost Ark” (1981) (the first “Indiana Jones” film) and so on. This also extends to shows like “Cobra Kai,” “Fuller House” and “Gossip Girl” — not to mention the ongoing live-action remakes of classic Disney movies.
These new reboots are virtually guaranteed an audience — not necessarily because they are good, but because people are nostalgic by nature. A movie one remembers as good becomes beloved once enough time passes — or even, sometimes, when practically no time passes at all. We are constantly sold the notion that new media can emulate the experience we had when watching these stories for the first time.
I think a part of the reason so many of these reboots fail to deliver is because people’s expectations are largely rooted in feelings of nostalgia — that is, a longing for memories that perhaps have been idealized in the time since. We paint the past in a consistently more loving, generous light.
When I stop and finally take off my rose-colored glasses, however, I realize that the past, just like the present, is merely what we make of it. Though I too reminisce on earlier days, I also look forward to a future of new media and new memories — fodder for an abundance of nostalgia to come.
We are the only independent newspaper here at USC, run at every level by students. That means we aren’t tied down by any other interests but those of readers like you: the students, faculty, staff and South Central residents that together make up the USC community.
Independence is a double-edged sword: We have a unique lens into the University’s actions and policies, and can hold powerful figures accountable when others cannot. But that also means our budget is severely limited. We’re already spread thin as we compensate the writers, photographers, artists, designers and editors whose incredible work you see in our daily paper; as we work to revamp and expand our digital presence, we now have additional staff making podcasts, videos, webpages, our first ever magazine and social media content, who are at risk of being unable to receive the support they deserve.
We are therefore indebted to readers like you, who, by supporting us, help keep our paper daily (we are the only remaining college paper on the West Coast that prints every single weekday), independent, free and widely accessible.
Please consider supporting us. Even $1 goes a long way in supporting our work; if you are able, you can also support us with monthly, or even annual, donations. Thank you.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept settingsDo Not AcceptWe may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.
If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Google reCaptcha Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:
The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them: