‘Loki’ comes mischievously close to greatness
The second season of Marvel’s series disappoints and delights in equal measure.
3.5
The second season of Marvel’s series disappoints and delights in equal measure.
3.5
To follow up the first season of “Loki” is a tough task. The fantasy series’ debut in June 2021 received overwhelmingly positive critical and fan reception on its way to blowing up the rules of the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Still, Tom Hiddleston and company had more stories to tell, and the two-year wait was … almost worth it. Season 2 of “Loki” features a strong cast and excellent production design, but ultimately fails to be something truly special.
The new season picks up right where the first one left off, and introduces its latest puzzle pieces pretty rapidly. This new slate of episodes centers around an intergalactic machine called the “Temporal Loom,” which is meant to hold the entire world together but has begun to malfunction. Ke Huy Quan joins the main cast as Ouroboros, a quirky and fast-talking time engineer, and the “Everything Everywhere All At Once” (2022) star makes an absolutely electric addition.
Daily headlines, sent straight to your inbox.
Subscribe to our newsletter to keep up with the latest at and around USC.
The other main changes come from behind the scenes. While season 1 was the brainchild of a five-person writers’ room, season 2’s head writer, Eric Martin, wrote four of the six episodes by himself. Season 1 director Kate Herron departed and was replaced by a directorial team led by “Moon Knight” directors Justin Benson and Aaron Moorhead.
This new and overwhelmingly male creative team seems correlated to the sidelining of Sylvie (Sophia Di Martino) for the majority of the season. Sylvie was a huge part of what made season 1 so compelling, but now she appears mostly to move the plot along or argue with Loki for a couple minutes before eventually being ignored.
It was really disappointing to watch Sylvie spiral into irrelevance, especially because her fundamental disagreements with the titular character make for some of the best moments of the season. It’s sad that these flashes of greatness are relegated to a B-story.
The rest of the cast continues to shine, led by the stellar ensemble from season 1. Owen Wilson still shines as the wise-cracking and esoteric Mobius and Eugene Cordero is hilariously meek in his beefed-up role as space-time receptionist Casey.
Wunmi Mosaku remains a powerful force as Hunter B-15 (though much like Sylvie, the writers relegate this compelling female character to the sidelines for much of the season’s central plot). There’s also more time for this cast to shine than season 1, including an interrogation gone wrong led by an excellently-anguished Wilson.
But the show’s main strength remains in its production design. The sets are delightful, with the first season’s bizarre mishmash of modern sci-fi and vintage technology returning in even greater force. “Loki” is a show that rewards the viewer if they pause to catch all the little in-jokes and quirky details. One scene early in the season involves a strange “key lime pie” room that was deliciously compelling and detailed, down to the pie itself. Costumes also obey this weirdo style, though they are a little less colorful and entertaining than in season 1.
As for the plot … that’s a different story. The “Temporal Loom,” as mentioned before, anchors this new adventure. However, the script quickly gives way to convoluted sci-fi nonsense about this “Loom.” This would be less of a visible problem in a more action-packed series, but “Loki” remains a slower, conversation-driven show.
The show’s pace can lead to a lot of strong character moments and delightful exchanges, but “Loki” seems a lot more interested in explaining every little detail about how Marvel’s space-time bureaucracy works — and it usually doesn’t make a lot of sense regardless. There are a lot of entertaining fantasy concepts here, but all of them are either too confusing or become the focus for far too long.
The whole story comes together in a finale with an entertaining time-loop conundrum and immensely high stakes. While the end of this story stays exciting and brings every idea explored throughout the series together, it’s still dominated by way too much sci-fi jargon to be fully satisfying as a conclusion. The show becomes haunted by the larger Marvel Cinematic Universe in the finale, leaving our heroes’ fates ambiguous enough that Kevin Feige’s production juggernaut can adjust the ending as needed.
“Loki,” as a superhero show from an action-driven studio, doesn’t function like an action series nor a superhero production for much of its runtime. The series, especially this season, drives its plot forward through conversation. To the show’s credit, the creative team made a perfect decision. “Loki” continues to be at its best when characters are having bizarro philosophical debates on who gets to control the entire multiverse (and how they should do it).
But “Loki” also found its footing during season 1 by resembling a normal television show, intentionally operating differently than its fellow Marvel programs. The cast consisted of original characters instead of preexisting heroes, the writer’s room was more diverse and the focus remained on the central characters’ inner struggles.
This new season, while far better than many other superhero projects nowadays, makes a crucial mistake, falling short of greatness. Simply put: The audience cares a whole lot more about central characters like Sylvie than a “Temporal Loom.” It’s disappointing to watch a show that gets so much right, only to get its priorities wrong.
We are the only independent newspaper here at USC, run at every level by students. That means we aren’t tied down by any other interests but those of readers like you: the students, faculty, staff and South Central residents that together make up the USC community.
Independence is a double-edged sword: We have a unique lens into the University’s actions and policies, and can hold powerful figures accountable when others cannot. But that also means our budget is severely limited. We’re already spread thin as we compensate the writers, photographers, artists, designers and editors whose incredible work you see in our daily paper; as we work to revamp and expand our digital presence, we now have additional staff making podcasts, videos, webpages, our first ever magazine and social media content, who are at risk of being unable to receive the support they deserve.
We are therefore indebted to readers like you, who, by supporting us, help keep our paper daily (we are the only remaining college paper on the West Coast that prints every single weekday), independent, free and widely accessible.
Please consider supporting us. Even $1 goes a long way in supporting our work; if you are able, you can also support us with monthly, or even annual, donations. Thank you.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept settingsDo Not AcceptWe may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.
If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Google reCaptcha Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:
The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them: