PUBLIC DISCLOSURE
Supremely misunderstood: realities of the high court
There are some less-publicized truths about the Supreme Court you deserve to know.
There are some less-publicized truths about the Supreme Court you deserve to know.
It’s probably no surprise that I love law. I love how studying it can surprise people: It’s one of those rare fields where you might find yourself truly understanding the decisions of people with whom you’d probably have very opposing beliefs elsewhere in life, especially in a polling booth.
Cut to the Supreme Court of the United States — a place where nine people might transform or destroy the lives of millions of Americans by day and kick back with a beer in front of their TVs by night. What’s gotten me more passionate about the Supreme Court, particularly after taking a half dozen law classes at USC, are the unexpected rulings and opinions released in the last few tumultuous years.
Many of us were, at least, confused by the recent unanimous ruling that former President Donald Trump must stay on the Colorado presidential primary ballot; you’d think that, on such a politically charged issue, a 6-3 ideological split would be in order. But the realities of our highest court — and those of the people who wear the robes — aren’t what they might seem.
Concurring opinions
You’ve likely heard of the sweeping majority opinion or the landmark dissent, but what took me longer to understand was the purpose of the concurring opinion. It’s a statement from one or more justices that might result in the same “yes” or “no” vote at face value, but that “partially concurs with and partially dissents from the majority’s views, or that concurs only in the result based on alternative reasons,” according to the U.S. Courts website.
You’re probably no stranger to your own kind of concurring opinions in life. To me, it reminds me of two people hating a professor; you don’t really like Mr. Smith because he’s unclear during lectures, but your friend got a bad grade on Mr. Smith’s midterm and, for that reason only, has sentenced him to a fiery, burning Rate My Professors hellscape for eternity.
A 9-0 ruling doesn’t always tell the full story — different ideological wings of the Supreme Court reveal lots in concurring opinions. Though they might have decided together in the Trump case that it is up to Congress to remove an insurrectionist from a federal office’s ballot rather than a “chaotic state-by-state patchwork” of laws, they had a particular disagreement in this case about judicial restraint.
“Even though ‘[a]ll nine Members of the Court’ agree that this independent and sufficient rationale resolves this case, five Justices go on … We cannot join an opinion that decides momentous and difficult issues unnecessarily, and we therefore concur only in the judgment,” read Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson’s joint opinion.
The common ground
Historically, right up until 2022, unanimous SCOTUS rulings were by far the most common — with an expected drop as the liberal-conservative balance was tipped even more since Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s confirmation. At the moment, 9-0 and 6-3 rulings are practically tied as the most common, at 29% and 30% respectively.
Even further, Chief Justice John Roberts has gone on record many times to say that in his own role, he has “a particular obligation to try to achieve consensus” with other members of the court.
“This commitment to consensus is important,” read one 2018 perspective from The Washington Post. “American law relies heavily on judicial precedent. A unified voice from the Supreme Court provides more clarity for both lower courts and the public on what the law is, instead of what it is believed to be.”
Some things left unsaid
The Supreme Court adopted its first official code of conduct last November, following multiple justices coming under fire for how they handled financial disclosures and recusals during conflicts of interest. But there’s no enforcement provision inside, likely due to its complications with the separation of powers, so its release was about as well-received as “Cats” (2019).
“The code says that if a spouse or child living with the justice has a substantial interest in the outcome of a case — financial or any other interest — the justice is supposed to recuse,” an NPR article read. “Last year, [Clarence] Thomas did not recuse, and was the sole dissenter, in a [Trump] case … despite Ginni Thomas’ texts to then-White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows urging him to take steps to overturn the 2020 presidential election results.”
A “yikes” for the ages, and that’s only one instance — one that’ll help fuel the fire of ethics concerns no matter who sits on our highest court.
CJ Haddad is a junior writing about local, state and federal laws we use in our daily lives. She is also the managing editor at the Daily Trojan. Her column, “Public Disclosure,” runs every other Thursday.
We are the only independent newspaper here at USC, run at every level by students. That means we aren’t tied down by any other interests but those of readers like you: the students, faculty, staff and South Central residents that together make up the USC community.
Independence is a double-edged sword: We have a unique lens into the University’s actions and policies, and can hold powerful figures accountable when others cannot. But that also means our budget is severely limited. We’re already spread thin as we compensate the writers, photographers, artists, designers and editors whose incredible work you see in our daily paper; as we work to revamp and expand our digital presence, we now have additional staff making podcasts, videos, webpages, our first ever magazine and social media content, who are at risk of being unable to receive the support they deserve.
We are therefore indebted to readers like you, who, by supporting us, help keep our paper daily (we are the only remaining college paper on the West Coast that prints every single weekday), independent, free and widely accessible.
Please consider supporting us. Even $1 goes a long way in supporting our work; if you are able, you can also support us with monthly, or even annual, donations. Thank you.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept settingsDo Not AcceptWe may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.
If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Google reCaptcha Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:
The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them: