‘Joker: Folie à Deux’ says a whole lot of nothing
Todd Phillips’ sequel film to “Joker” (2019) turned out a snoozefest in comparison.
By JEFFERSON HERNANDEZ SEGOVIA
1.5
Todd Phillips’ sequel film to “Joker” (2019) turned out a snoozefest in comparison.
1.5
“Joker: Folie à Deux” opens with a cartoon featuring the Joker with a full face of makeup, entering the premiere of his own talk show. While in the dressing room, his shadow comes to life, stealing the Joker’s host moment from him.
The cartoon showcases a divide between the Arthur Fleck and Joker personas, which is the main argument used in his defense in the courtroom drama.
Starring Joaquin Phoenix as the title character and Lady Gaga as Harley Quinn, “Joker: Folie à Deux” is a musical drama that takes place after the events of “Joker” (2019). The film follows Fleck as he navigates his murder trials for killing five people in the first feature, while also finding love in Quinn.
When it was first announced that the film would be a musical, the reception was mixed about the new approach to telling the DC Comics character’s story. However, the change in tone between the dark, dramatic scenes and the vibrant musical scenes was not captured well, oftentimes feeling jarring.
When Phoenix or Gaga would break out into song, it felt like the filmmakers decided to add musical performances to the film because they thought it was cool, but they had no experience making a musical.
In one of the scenes, Fleck gets assaulted by police, but the scene quickly cuts to Quinn putting on clown makeup while singing. The film brushes aside this pivotal moment, never using it to move the story. This is a constant theme throughout “Joker: Folie à Deux”: scenes just happen because they can, not because they are necessary.
As a character, Fleck is a very passive and boring protagonist because all of the characters around him make the decisions for him. Between being bullied by Jackie Sullivan (Brendan Gleeson) and being told what to say by his lawyer, Maryanne Stewart (Catherine Keener), he just reacts to the actions people take, but he does not have a clear goal.
The introduction of Quinn to the franchise added nothing to the plotline. She lies about being mentally ill to check herself into the hospital, but there is no conflict built by this situation. Every time there is a little bit of friction, there is a deus ex machina randomly coming out of the woodwork and saving the day.
This is very obvious when the jury calls the verdict for the trial and an explosion blows up the courtroom, allowing Fleck to escape. The entire hour spent watching the courtroom sequences felt like a waste of time because there was no resolution to the trial.
At the end, a major conflict happens to Fleck with an inmate in prison. Within the context of the film, this did not make sense because we saw the inmate once or twice in the two hours, but he also had no lines until that moment. While the movie is a tragedy, the moment leaves the audience with zero emotions in this devastating moment because it’s so random.
From start to finish, the story focuses on Fleck’s disconnect from the Joker personality, yet the discussions around the topic are shallow and unimaginative. They offer little contribution to conversations about mental illness and begin to be repetitive after every witness on the stand gets asked the same question about Fleck’s split identities.
One redeemable quality of “Joker: Folie à Deux” is Gaga’s performance as Quinn. The script presented her with a limited amount of dialogue, but she played an obsessive Joker fanatic well through her physical and vocal performance.
Technically speaking, the score by Hildur Guðnadóttir elevated the film in ways the musical numbers could not. It showcased the dark and twisted tone of the film, and it felt refreshing to hear those strings again in the city of Gotham.
Compared to “Joker,” “Joker: Folie à Deux” accentuates the problem with sequels, often feeling rushed and offering zero valuable topics of conversation to the cultural zeitgeist. The sequel had the potential to be great if it was in the hands of the right people. “Joker” had a clear vision, but its sequel is all over the place with no clear path to where it wants to go.
We are the only independent newspaper here at USC, run at every level by students. That means we aren’t tied down by any other interests but those of readers like you: the students, faculty, staff and South Central residents that together make up the USC community.
Independence is a double-edged sword: We have a unique lens into the University’s actions and policies, and can hold powerful figures accountable when others cannot. But that also means our budget is severely limited. We’re already spread thin as we compensate the writers, photographers, artists, designers and editors whose incredible work you see in our daily paper; as we work to revamp and expand our digital presence, we now have additional staff making podcasts, videos, webpages, our first ever magazine and social media content, who are at risk of being unable to receive the support they deserve.
We are therefore indebted to readers like you, who, by supporting us, help keep our paper daily (we are the only remaining college paper on the West Coast that prints every single weekday), independent, free and widely accessible.
Please consider supporting us. Even $1 goes a long way in supporting our work; if you are able, you can also support us with monthly, or even annual, donations. Thank you.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept settingsDo Not AcceptWe may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.
If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Google reCaptcha Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:
The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them: