USC needs to standardize its attendance policies
The University’s inconsistent class attendance policies does not benefit anybody.
The University’s inconsistent class attendance policies does not benefit anybody.
One to unlimited. That’s the range of absences I’m allowed in my classes before it affects my grade. In my class with the most extreme attendance policy, one excused absence is permitted, and every subsequent absence results in a grade drop by a third of a letter, meaning one absence — excused or not — could take you from an A- to a B+. My classes with the most lenient attendance policies don’t take attendance at all, so there is no number of absences you could accrue that would directly lower your grade.
This is an experience echoed by many of my peers. Every day, we juggle half a dozen attendance policies in our minds, trying to remember if we should sprint to get to our class on time or if we aren’t penalized for tardies. While I trust professors to make their own decisions on grading policies for their courses, I feel that these discrepancies from course to course can have a number of unexpected side effects.
For one, it’s confusing. As university students, we already have a lot on our plates and trying to discern wildly different attendance policies feels like a waste of our brain power. It would be simpler to standardize.
Second, overly lenient attendance policies only work fairly if class materials cannot be accessed without attending the class. Classes in which students are tested on material communicated by the professor but not written on any slides or published notes tend to incentivize attendance, as students generally want the information they need to succeed on assessments and will go to class if that is the only way to get it.
In this vein, one of my professors does not take attendance, and a significant portion of the class period is spent working on a weekly graded assignment. If you go to class, you will essentially be guided through the assignment in a way that guarantees a 100, but if you do not attend, you’ll have to spend some time figuring it out on your own. If you are sick, however, and send the professor a record of your illness, he’ll send you a recording of the lecture.
This system is almost perfect, save one flaw: the lecture slides are posted on Brightspace. While I believe that students who regularly choose to skip classes are choosing to waste their own money, it becomes frustrating when I see my peers who cut performing just as well as me on assignments, just from perusing the materials posted on Brightspace.
But what about the opposite? As much as I dislike overly lenient attendance policies, I also see the flaws in overly stringent ones. A bit over a month ago, I noticed the occasional cough in my classrooms. A week later, every other student was sniffling or hacking. While a certain amount of illness during cold and flu season is inevitable on college campuses, I believe some of it can be attributed to overly stringent attendance policies.
When students can only afford one or two absences over the course of the semester, staying home for illness just a month into the semester can feel really risky. Additionally, many common illnesses take a couple of weeks to run their course and can be contagious for much of that time, so the “one excused absence” policies can certainly contribute to the spread of illness.
And these overly strict policies can feel punitive even outside of illness. USC, and Los Angeles as a whole, offer countless unique opportunities to students, many of which coincide with classes. If a student has the opportunity to attend an advanced screening of a film they can’t wait to see, if they’re invited to a big networking event or if a relative is visiting for a day from overseas, they should be able to weigh their options to decide how they’d like to spend their time and money.
When students are saying “no” to potentially formative life events because they’re scared of a grade deduction, I’d say it’s time to review the attendance policy.
I believe the best classes are those that incentivize attendance by offering key information that can only be accessed in person, except in the case of short-term illness, which should not be penalized. For nonmedical absences, a final grade deduction of one to two percentage points feels appropriate.
Here’s hoping the policies get an update.
We are the only independent newspaper here at USC, run at every level by students. That means we aren’t tied down by any other interests but those of readers like you: the students, faculty, staff and South Central residents that together make up the USC community.
Independence is a double-edged sword: We have a unique lens into the University’s actions and policies, and can hold powerful figures accountable when others cannot. But that also means our budget is severely limited. We’re already spread thin as we compensate the writers, photographers, artists, designers and editors whose incredible work you see in our daily paper; as we work to revamp and expand our digital presence, we now have additional staff making podcasts, videos, webpages, our first ever magazine and social media content, who are at risk of being unable to receive the support they deserve.
We are therefore indebted to readers like you, who, by supporting us, help keep our paper daily (we are the only remaining college paper on the West Coast that prints every single weekday), independent, free and widely accessible.
Please consider supporting us. Even $1 goes a long way in supporting our work; if you are able, you can also support us with monthly, or even annual, donations. Thank you.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept settingsDo Not AcceptWe may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.
If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Google reCaptcha Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:
The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them: