BIG TEN BITES
Men’s basketball is having a head-scratching season
A year of firsts is turning into a year of bursts, both good and bad, for the Trojans.
A year of firsts is turning into a year of bursts, both good and bad, for the Trojans.
What a week for USC men’s basketball.
The Trojans (13-8, 5-5 Big Ten) have had a volatile season up to this point, earning two ranked wins while simultaneously suffering three double-digit losses in conference play and five such losses overall.
This isn’t a complete surprise, given how much new terrain USC is navigating this season. The Trojans are in their first season in the Big Ten. Head Coach Eric Musselman is in his opening year in Los Angeles. Every player in the rotation for USC’s upset win over Michigan State, starter or bench, is in their first season with the team.
While the inconsistency is no surprise, there are signs USC is building toward a resurgence. However, this is far from a guarantee. The easiest way to achieve stability is to have little roster turnover, which is not going to happen for USC.
The Trojans currently have 10 senior or graduate players on their roster and will likely lose most if not all of them heading into next year. Three of those players — senior forward Saint Thomas, graduate guard Chibuzo Agbo and graduate forward Josh Cohen — have started at least 18 of USC’s 21 games this season, meaning they’re not just bottom-of-the-bench players.
The silver lining is that USC is slated to bring in one of the top recruiting classes in the country, decreasing the severity of the roster losses.
The gem of the class is guard Alijah Arenas, the No. 7 recruit and highest-rated shooting guard in the class according to the 247Sports composite rankings. Arenas, the son of former NBA player Gil Arenas, is joined by two four-star recruits — guards Jerry Easter and Elzie Harrington — who are both top-65 players in the class to give USC the No. 7 class in the country.
A freshman’s high rating certainly does not mean they will be instant starters when they step foot on campus, though. Freshman forward Jalen Shelley and freshman wing Isaiah Elohim were top-65 players in last year’s class but have combined to average 9.7 minutes per game.
Alijah Arenas is a different beast given his five-star status, but the Trojans cannot necessarily expect him to lead them to the NCAA Tournament in his first, and maybe only, year on campus.
Rutgers (11-11, 4-7) has exemplified that this season, bringing in the No. 2 and No. 3 players in the 2024 cycle in freshman guard and forward Ace Bailey and freshman guard Dylan Harper.
The main problem for Rutgers, beyond an admittedly stiff schedule, is that Bailey and Harper are the only players who average more than 8 points per game for the Scarlet Knights. In addition to the star freshmen, Rutgers brought in junior guard Jordan Derkack, a four-star transfer from Merrimack College. Derkack is the team’s third-leading scorer, with 7.3 points per game.
In a way, the Scarlet Knights are having similar consistency issues to the Trojans since their three leading scorers are all newcomers to the squad.
That is not to say freshmen can’t be part of elite squads. The only player above Bailey and Harper in the 2024 recruiting cycle is Duke’s freshman wing Cooper Flagg. The Blue Devils, who currently sit at 19-2 with a perfect 11-0 record in the ACC, are a basketball blue blood and are, therefore, an entirely different beast — they brought in five five-star freshmen for this season — but the Trojans can still use them as a blueprint.
Only six players have started a game for Duke this season. While three of those players are five-star freshmen, the other three are veterans who add experience to the floor amid the inexperience of Flagg and his fellow first years. The Trojans have the veterans this season but not the young, inexperienced talent like Bailey, Harper or Flagg.
USC does not yet have the recruiting pull of Duke, but the Trojans also don’t need to be 19-2 through 21 games to crack the NCAA Tournament field either. It is hard to tell whether USC will make March Madness this season — ESPN’s bracketology currently has Musselman’s squad on the bubble — but if the Trojans follow Duke’s model of surrounding talented freshmen with strong veterans, they have a good shot to be a strong team in the Dance next season.
While Thomas, Agbo and Cohen are likely leaving after this season, key starters still have eligibility to come back to Galen Center next season. Junior guard Desmond Claude and redshirt freshman guard Wesley Yates III, who are two of USC’s three top scorers in terms of points per game, have the chance to return, barring a decision by either of them to enter the transfer portal or declare for the NBA Draft.
Yates III and Claude can be USC’s veterans, surrounded by the likes of young talent in Alijah Arenas and soon-to-be sophomores Shelley and Elohim.
Even though the Trojans would prefer not to be sitting with a .500 record in conference play, touting a 35-point loss earlier in a nonconference game, Musselman has laid the building blocks for a successful program at USC in only his first year at the helm.
There have been many positive firsts among the flurry of firsts this season. The Trojans’ win over Illinois (15-7, 7-5) was their first ranked road win since 2010. USC’s win over the Spartans will always represent Musselman’s first victory over a top-10 opponent with the Trojans.
This year is the season of firsts. But hold onto your seats, Trojan fans. The Muss Bus has only just started rolling.
Thomas Johnson is a senior writing about USC’s arrival to a new conference and all of the implications surrounding the entrance in his column, “Big Ten Bites,” which runs every other Wednesday.
We are the only independent newspaper here at USC, run at every level by students. That means we aren’t tied down by any other interests but those of readers like you: the students, faculty, staff and South Central residents that together make up the USC community.
Independence is a double-edged sword: We have a unique lens into the University’s actions and policies, and can hold powerful figures accountable when others cannot. But that also means our budget is severely limited. We’re already spread thin as we compensate the writers, photographers, artists, designers and editors whose incredible work you see in our paper; as we work to revamp and expand our digital presence, we now have additional staff making podcasts, videos, webpages, our first ever magazine and social media content, who are at risk of being unable to receive the support they deserve.
We are therefore indebted to readers like you, who, by supporting us, help keep our paper independent, free and widely accessible.
Please consider supporting us. Even $1 goes a long way in supporting our work; if you are able, you can also support us with monthly, or even annual, donations. Thank you.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept settingsDo Not AcceptWe may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.
If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Google reCaptcha Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:
The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them: