CHRONICALLY ONLINE
Katy Perry’s ‘E.T.’ takes on a whole new meaning
One small step for Katy Perry is one big step for carbon emissions.
One small step for Katy Perry is one big step for carbon emissions.


There’s never a shortage of topics for me to write about every other week for this column when I do some quick research on whatever seemingly banal topic actually indicates the end of the world. I rifle through pop culture news looking for anything that strikes a nerve with me so that I can write around 800 words that might make my editors and a few readers laugh.
It was easy to find something ridiculous, like it always is. I was tempted to write about Issa Rae’s failed gay-for-pay attempt in the most recent season of “Black Mirror.” It’s hilarious to me that there’s currently a pop culture moment revolving around the fact that people didn’t appreciate the fact that Rae and Emma Corrin’s makeout scenes look like someone making two Barbies kiss thanks to a lack of chemistry, among other aspects of the episode.
Ultimately, I couldn’t ignore the Blue Origin spectacle, despite my best attempts to pretend it wasn’t a real thing that was happening. Unlike an unconvincing lesbian performance in a show I don’t even watch, the implications of the entire ordeal have undeniable direct effects on my life and indicate a concerning cultural trajectory that makes me sweat.
Nine women were sent into space by Jeff Bezos’ company, all of whom had different qualifications for being onboard. To name a few: Amanda Nguyen, a Nobel Peace Prize-nominated civil rights activist and actual astronaut; Aisha Bowe, a former NASA rocket scientist and entrepreneur; Lauren Sánchez, an acclaimed journalist who just so happens to be Bezos’ recent fiancée; and pop star Katy Perry.
Don’t get me wrong, “Teenage Dream” is without a doubt a seminal pop record whose cultural influence cannot be understated, along with Perry’s success. Counterpoint: What does thanking God that it’s Friday have to do with throttling toward Earth’s orbit at 25,000 miles per hour?
The marketing surrounding the Blue Origin mission has placed its crew at the forefront, specifically hocking the trip as a girlboss feat, with New Shepard’s — Blue Origin’s reusable rocket launch system — Senior Vice President Phil Joyce calling the crew “trailblazers.”
“Each of these women is a storyteller who will use their voices — individually and together — to channel their life-changing experience today into creating lasting impact that will inspire people across our planet for generations,” Joyce said in a Blue Origin press release.
The theatrics of this entire debacle are meant to distract from the fact that each mission Blue Origin sends into space emits copious amounts of greenhouse gases into the upper atmosphere and perpetuates high-cost tourism, widening the gap between income classes.
I’m so happy for Katy Perry that she was able to give a thousand-yard stare at a webcam while holding a daisy in zero gravity and now feels “super connected to love.”
But as someone that earnestly tries to sort my trash in Tutor Campus Center, I’m not sure I can muster up the strength to see space tourism as anything other than a dystopian commodification of an enterprise that used to be reserved for exploration and the betterment of the human race’s shared knowledge.
It’s bad enough that Perry kissed the ground after leaving the pod as if she had been through an ordeal despite the experience being something she paid more than enough to cover an entire year of my tuition for — and I invite her to do that if she feels so inclined.
But now, of all possibilities, Wendy’s — a major corporation whose X account is probably run by a chronically online intern — is on the vanguard of public backlash for the exorbitant trip into space after replying to the news that Perry had returned to Earth with “Can we send her back.”
I am now taking it upon myself to criticize on a slightly different platform than a fast-food corporation as a student at a university paper run only slightly differently than Wendy’s. While I can’t unsend Perry or Sánchez to space, I sure can complain about it.
Since starting this column at the beginning of the semester, I’ve become more negative. I’m always keeping an eye out for annoying or problematic things that famous people have done. I’m always looking for cultural phenomena that irk me. I feel like a less charming version of Rachel Dratch’s “Saturday Night Live” character Debbie Downer every other week.
That being said, it’s also reminded me that complaining through an independent university paper is better than nothing. At least I’m not remaining silent as legislative and cultural precedents are overturned or diversity, equity and inclusion are rebranded as “community.”
Student journalism is a small yet not an inconsequential tide in the movement of media. With 21 million people in the United States enrolled as undergraduates as of the 2023-24 school year, the voices of student papers represent a significant portion of the nation’s population. These writers aren’t just U.S.-born undergraduate students, but also international students and graduate students all trying to make their voices heard.
Maybe you don’t care about failed gay-for-pay “Black Mirror” episodes or millionaire pop stars in space. Maybe all of my takes seem obnoxiously chronically online and useless to the greater commentary of human activity. But if that’s the case, look no further than the other articles available at the Daily Trojan. You’ll probably find what you’re looking for.
Anna Jordan is a sophomore writing about pop culture controversies in her column, “Chronically Online,” which runs every other Thursday. She is also a chief copy editor at the Daily Trojan.
We are the only independent newspaper here at USC, run at every level by students. That means we aren’t tied down by any other interests but those of readers like you: the students, faculty, staff and South Central residents that together make up the USC community.
Independence is a double-edged sword: We have a unique lens into the University’s actions and policies, and can hold powerful figures accountable when others cannot. But that also means our budget is severely limited. We’re already spread thin as we compensate the writers, photographers, artists, designers and editors whose incredible work you see in our paper; as we work to revamp and expand our digital presence, we now have additional staff making podcasts, videos, webpages, our first ever magazine and social media content, who are at risk of being unable to receive the support they deserve.
We are therefore indebted to readers like you, who, by supporting us, help keep our paper independent, free and widely accessible.
Please consider supporting us. Even $1 goes a long way in supporting our work; if you are able, you can also support us with monthly, or even annual, donations. Thank you.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept settingsDo Not AcceptWe may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.
If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Google reCaptcha Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:
The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:
