Planned Parenthood deserves funding, despite legislation against it
Defunding abortion providers will have disastrous consequences for the health of low-income communities.
Defunding abortion providers will have disastrous consequences for the health of low-income communities.

The Republican-majority House of Representatives recently passed the comically named One Big Beautiful Bill Act on May 22. This piece of legislation includes a catalogue of conservative favorites such as phasing out former President Joe Biden’s clean energy tax credits, adding funding for mass deportations and imposing work requirements for access to food assistance and Medicaid. Nestled between these nuggets of gutting the social safety net, there is also a provision which, in effect, would defund Planned Parenthood.
Section 44126 of the bill prohibits Medicaid reimbursements for healthcare providers who perform abortion services. If passed in the Senate, this would be a major blow to organizations like Planned Parenthood, which rely on Medicaid reimbursements to service underprivileged communities. Allowing this funding is crucial for the reproductive healthcare of low-income individuals, and the downstream socioeconomic consequences will be costly for all of us.
Most of the supporters of this provision praise gutting funding because Planned Parenthood provides abortion services. The argument goes that federal funding should not be directed towards abortion providers, hence why the bill is supported by organizations like Americans United For Life, an anti-abortion law firm.
Ripping away healthcare for millions of people under the guise of caring about life notwithstanding, the kicker is that federal funding already cannot be used for abortions — unless under limited exceptions — due to the Hyde Amendment passed in 1976. Unilaterally cutting off Medicaid funding because of abortions is accordingly politically redundant and actively harmful to those who use the multitudes of other non-abortive services that organizations like Planned Parenthood provide.
For example, in addition to abortions, Planned Parenthood affiliates provide birth control, STI testing, pregnancy testing and planning, vaccinations, HIV services, and mental health treatments, among many other kinds of necessary healthcare.
Given that this bill is targeting Medicaid — which helps cover medical costs for those with limited means — its implementation would hit low-income people the most.
According to KFF Health Tracking Poll data from May, “Over four in ten individuals with Medicaid say they have received services at Planned Parenthood.” Moreover, abortion accounts for only 3% of Planned Parenthood’s care. As KFF highlights, this means “the majority of medicaid beneficiaries who received family planning services at a Planned Parenthood clinic received contraceptive and STI services,” not abortions.
Removing this reproductive safety net where people can receive birth control or family planning services leaves, as estimated by the Congressional Budget Office, 13.7 million people without health care coverage by 2034.
The downstream impacts of defunding Planned Parenthood will impact people all throughout the U.S.
Defunding it could lead to the shuttering of over a hundred health centers across the country. Planned Parenthood services more than 2 million patients every year, with 64% of its centers located in rural and medically underserved areas and just over half of its patients getting care through publicly funded programs like Medicaid or Title X. Additionally, two out of three patients reported that publicly funded health centers, such as Planned Parenthood, were their primary source of healthcare.
Economically, preventative healthcare, which Planned Parenthood provides, also saves billions of taxpayer dollars per year.
Researchers at the Brookings Institute, Emily Monea and Adam Thomas, estimated in 2011 that “public savings from preventing these unintended pregnancies would range from $4.7 billion to $6.2 billion, and average $5.6 billion” per year. The Guttmacher Institute found that “the total public cost of unintended pregnancy in 2006 was $11.1 billion” per year and also estimated that for every federal dollar spent on contraception, the government saves $5 on pregnancy treatment.
These attacks on reproductive freedom and access to affordable healthcare are not exclusive to a Republican-controlled government.
Albeit perhaps less ideologically driven, California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s new Medi-Cal budget shifts $1.6 billion allocated by Proposition 35 — a ballot measure which earmarked more than $2 billion of tax revenue for Medi-Cal — to help tamp down California’s deficit. In addition to Prop 35 changes, Newsom also seeks to shift $500 million from the state’s tobacco tax, some of which is allotted for family planning and reproductive health services, to the general state budget.
In doing so, Newsom is copying the Republican defunding playbook while touting being a champion of reproductive rights. If California wants to maintain its reputation as a beacon of reproductive freedom, we cannot cripple Planned Parenthood’s ability to provide healthcare.
Contact your state and federal representatives and express your opposition to the budget reconciliation bill and Newsom’s budget reallocation, especially its provisions that strip necessary funding from health care organizations like Planned Parenthood.
We are the only independent newspaper here at USC, run at every level by students. That means we aren’t tied down by any other interests but those of readers like you: the students, faculty, staff and South Central residents that together make up the USC community.
Independence is a double-edged sword: We have a unique lens into the University’s actions and policies, and can hold powerful figures accountable when others cannot. But that also means our budget is severely limited. We’re already spread thin as we compensate the writers, photographers, artists, designers and editors whose incredible work you see in our paper; as we work to revamp and expand our digital presence, we now have additional staff making podcasts, videos, webpages, our first ever magazine and social media content, who are at risk of being unable to receive the support they deserve.
We are therefore indebted to readers like you, who, by supporting us, help keep our paper independent, free and widely accessible.
Please consider supporting us. Even $1 goes a long way in supporting our work; if you are able, you can also support us with monthly, or even annual, donations. Thank you.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept settingsDo Not AcceptWe may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.
If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Google reCaptcha Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:
The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:
