Postdocs frustrated with pace of bargaining
Postdoctoral scholars’ union is planning a rally aligned with the fall convocation.
Postdoctoral scholars’ union is planning a rally aligned with the fall convocation.

USC’s union of postdoctoral scholars alleged the University was deliberately slowing down the bargaining process in “an attempt to demobilize workers” after the pace of bargaining has slowed roughly a year into negotiations, but USC said it has been negotiating fairly.
The union, USC Researchers and Fellows United – United Auto Workers, formed in June 2024 but has yet to negotiate its first contract with the University.
Seventeen of 32 articles listed on URFU-UAW’s bargaining tracker have been tentatively agreed upon but major points of contention, including compensation and childcare, have yet to receive agreements.
At a July 30 bargaining session, USC brought forth one proposal on an unresolved item and also presented two minor articles dealing with the contract’s language. While the union brought none, it criticized the University’s recent proposals in an Instagram post, calling them a waste of time and a stalling measure.
Of the articles listed on the bargaining tracker, 13 are awaiting a USC response while the remaining two need a response from URFU-UAW. The union brought four proposals to the table at an Aug. 13 bargaining session.
“For them to be, frankly, wasting their own time and wasting our time coming up with this housekeeping language at a time when there’s still so many substantive issues on the table was really surprising,” said David Helps, a member of URFU-UAW’s bargaining committee and a postdoctoral scholar at the Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences. “[Postdocs] are, across the board, pretty frustrated.”
In a statement to the Daily Trojan, the University wrote that it has been “fully engaged” in the contract negotiations and noted the 17 tentative agreements as a testament to their efforts.
“We will continue to negotiate in good faith,” the statement read.
Helps said wages for postdoctoral scholars and a childcare stipend are two major priorities for the bargaining team moving forward.
URFU-UAW’s initial wage proposal had the minimum annual salary at $82,500, with more experienced scholars making at least $92,000, as well as a one-time payment of $8,000 to all postdocs. The University countered with a minimum at just over $68,000, and the union’s second proposal didn’t budge significantly on its demands.
Helps said USC’s proposal was uncompetitive, comparing it to salaries at other universities including UCLA and Stanford, where he said postdocs are getting paid significantly more.
While UCLA’s minimum annual salary, roughly $69,000, is similar to USC’s proposal, Helps said UCLA offers wage increases after each year as a postdoc that allow them to make significantly more than USC scholars. After five years as a postdoc at UCLA, the minimum annual salary is north of $82,000.
While USC’s proposal said it could give salaries above the $68,000 minimum, it did not have a set raise based on service time like UCLA.
Stanford’s minimum annual salary for postdocs starts much higher at roughly $76,000 but doesn’t increase as significantly with service time.
The University proposed allowing postdocs to use on-site childcare centers rather than a childcare stipend, which the union countered with language similar to its original draft: $5,000 per child under six years old.
URFU-UAW is planning a rally at Tommy Trojan on Aug. 21 called “Postdocs Demand: Harassment-Free USC.” The rally will begin at 8 a.m., shortly before the New Student Convocation at the nearby Alumni Park at 8:30 a.m.
The rally will focus on USC and the union’s differing proposals for reporting discrimination and harassment. URFU-UAW’s initial proposal outlined specific guidelines for specifics like bathroom equity — the assurance of convenient access to gender-neutral bathrooms — and lactation support, with accommodations for pregnancy or pregnancy-related conditions, as well as a specific list of prohibited conduct.
USC’s counter proposal encouraged reporting to the Office of Civil Rights Compliance — formerly known as the Office for Equity, Equal Opportunity, and Title IX — or to federal agencies and did not provide as many specifics.
“Instead of addressing our need, USC claimed we do not need protections because we are more likely to be accused of harassment than be victims of it,” the Instagram post announcing the rally read. “New Trojans and their families deserve the right to know about USC’s position on enforceable protections from harassment and discrimination.”
USC did not state that postdoctoral students were more likely to be accused of harassment than victims of it in the counter proposal.
The rally would be the second for the union in August. An Aug. 5 rally at Keith Administrative Building on the Health Sciences Campus ended with union representatives leaving a note for Keck School of Medicine of USC Dean Carolyn Meltzer demanding action on some of the undecided items, the union said on Instagram.
Helps said both the union and USC would prefer to come to an agreement at the negotiating table and pointed to the multiple bargaining sessions scheduled for August as an opportunity to do so.
However, Helps said actions including rallies and petitions will continue to be on the table moving forward if an agreement is not reached. The union announced its rally at convocation before the first bargaining session of the month on Aug. 13.
“It doesn’t seem like they respond to anything except putting a spotlight on this and applying pressure,” Helps said. “Postdocs will continue to do whatever it takes to make it clear how important these issues are to all of us.”
We are the only independent newspaper here at USC, run at every level by students. That means we aren’t tied down by any other interests but those of readers like you: the students, faculty, staff and South Central residents that together make up the USC community.
Independence is a double-edged sword: We have a unique lens into the University’s actions and policies, and can hold powerful figures accountable when others cannot. But that also means our budget is severely limited. We’re already spread thin as we compensate the writers, photographers, artists, designers and editors whose incredible work you see in our paper; as we work to revamp and expand our digital presence, we now have additional staff making podcasts, videos, webpages, our first ever magazine and social media content, who are at risk of being unable to receive the support they deserve.
We are therefore indebted to readers like you, who, by supporting us, help keep our paper independent, free and widely accessible.
Please consider supporting us. Even $1 goes a long way in supporting our work; if you are able, you can also support us with monthly, or even annual, donations. Thank you.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept settingsDo Not AcceptWe may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.
If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Google reCaptcha Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:
The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:
