‘The Life of a Showgirl’ is offensively boring
The pop icon’s latest venture is untextured and artistically lifeless.
1.5
The pop icon’s latest venture is untextured and artistically lifeless.
1.5

Taylor Swift: a behemoth of pop power and songwriting mastery, ever at the top of the charts, always rerouting the currents of the pop genre’s waters. Yet with “The Life of a Showgirl,” Swift succumbs to the rapids of a movement she once pioneered. Even the best of the album would be the weakest track on a previous record, while the worst songs sink to new lows for the pop virtuoso.
A heartbreaking loss for those who love to get lost in her lyrics, Swift’s previously present artistry is nowhere to be found in the one-dimensional sugar pop throwaways that leave a saccharine taste in the mouth throughout her latest album, which was released Friday.
The album has its highs: “Opalite” has upbeat, doo-wop sensibilities and succeeds in its playfulness thanks to Swift’s lower register over an upbeat track. Despite being flawed, “Ruin the Friendship” features a glimmer of storytelling from her “Fearless” days. Nevertheless, even the best songs on the album pale in comparison to her previous work.
Playfulness is not unwelcome among sophisti-pop artists, especially following a more heady, conceptual project — look no further than Tyler, The Creator following “CHROMAKOPIA” with “DON’T TAP THE GLASS.”
However, after the already underbaked “THE TORTURED POETS DEPARTMENT” had fans questioning her pen game, “The Life of the Showgirl” substitutes a sense of play and exploration for vapidity, often opting for flawed metaphors and clunky allusions that underestimate the intelligence of the listener.
The album kicks off with a bastardized reference to Shakespeare’s Ophelia, one of several casualties in “Hamlet.” Like the sweet opening piano plucks that abruptly glaze over into uninteresting synths, the title of the song, “The Fate of Ophelia,” promises a nuanced subject before revealing an underdeveloped interpretation of Ophelia’s demise.
Swift’s breathy vocals can’t make up for the fact that Ophelia’s fate was sealed before she entered her grave, a rejected, newly orphaned single woman at court and possibly a bereft mother.
The lyric “You dug me out of my grave and / Saved my heart from the fate of Ophelia” feels like yet another attempt to rewrite a Shakespearean tragedy, only this time, she didn’t read the play and instead skimmed the English literature canon for a reference of heartbreak.
“The Fate of Ophelia” brings another new and unwelcome tic to the forefront, as Swift has developed — or rather devolved into — the habit of forcing in syllables and awkward diction into already-busy lyrics in an attempt at memorable songwriting.
Another major culprit of word gargling, “Elizabeth Taylor” is filled to the brim with forgettable lyrics and tossed-in references to the song’s namesake, all surrounded by unnecessary prepositions that make the thread of the song treacherous to follow in a soup of syllables.
Evidently, Swift is a student of pop culture and wears her influences on her sleeve, interpolating the melody of George Michael’s “Father Figure” in her song of the same name and crediting Michael as a writer on her track. However, the thematic and titular reference makes little sense, only highlighted by an amateurish lyrical rhythm that lacks parallelism, especially in the misplaced line, “I can make deals with the devil because my dick’s bigger.”
It’s especially shocking that the main downfall of this album is its lackluster and hilariously explicit songwriting coming from an artist championed for her evergreen and universal lyrical chops from the moment she entered the music industry. Tracks like The Jackson 5’s sonic cousin “Wood” — a song tipping over with dick-uendos in every other line — and overly falsetto “Wi$h Li$t”, are distractingly sexual or explicit despite having relatively interesting hooks.
Although the guitar motif maintains a gorgeous tone, “Actually Romantic” adds to Swift’s collection of nebulous and unsuccessfully hyperbolic diss tracks about the women — or a cuttingly sympathetic Charli xcx — who have wronged her, with lukewarm insults that were once cute and relatable in tracks like “Better Than Revenge.” But after years of beefing with artists who are inevitably smaller than her, it begs for eye rolls rather than wide eyes.
However, the lack of subtlety on “The Life of the Showgirl” reads less like a loss of talent and more like a lack of editing and external input. Rather than her loved-up personal life having a dampening effect on her poeticism as some listeners suspect, the album’s offensively boring tracks, filled with slang words that date the album, appear to be a product of Swift’s artistic environment.
Songs like “Eldest Daughter,” the poor man’s “mirrorball” or “CANCELLED!,” the poor man’s “New Romantics” or “Honey,” the poor man’s “Daylight” and even the album’s title track featuring Sabrina Carpenter, the poor man’s “Clara Bow,” reflect a corporate writing environment devoid of artistic presence.
Instead, Swift has made room for yes-men who affirm her status as a money bank rather than question the predictable chord progressions from Max Martin and Shellback or Swift’s Tumblr-post-worthy lyrics.
The problem isn’t that Swift is happy — on the contrary, the problem is that Swift is complacent. In “The Life of a Showgirl,” she relies on her reputation as an elite songwriter to convince fans to trust that she’s just playing around when she calls women she doesn’t like “bitches” in several songs. But after three albums straight of some of her weakest songwriting, she needs to push the envelope rather than seal it with a kiss and a wink.
As Swift sings in “Opalite,” “failure brings you freedom.” If her money is where her mouth is and the words are true, Swift isn’t quite free yet, but “The Life of a Showgirl” brings her a whole lot closer.
We are the only independent newspaper here at USC, run at every level by students. That means we aren’t tied down by any other interests but those of readers like you: the students, faculty, staff and South Central residents that together make up the USC community.
Independence is a double-edged sword: We have a unique lens into the University’s actions and policies, and can hold powerful figures accountable when others cannot. But that also means our budget is severely limited. We’re already spread thin as we compensate the writers, photographers, artists, designers and editors whose incredible work you see in our paper; as we work to revamp and expand our digital presence, we now have additional staff making podcasts, videos, webpages, our first ever magazine and social media content, who are at risk of being unable to receive the support they deserve.
We are therefore indebted to readers like you, who, by supporting us, help keep our paper independent, free and widely accessible.
Please consider supporting us. Even $1 goes a long way in supporting our work; if you are able, you can also support us with monthly, or even annual, donations. Thank you.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept settingsDo Not AcceptWe may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.
If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Google reCaptcha Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:
The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:
