‘Now You See Me: Now You Don’t’ has no new tricks up its sleeve
Although new characters illusion viewers, the third installment of the franchise is more nostalgic than anything.
3
Although new characters illusion viewers, the third installment of the franchise is more nostalgic than anything.
3

Nearly a decade after the release of the second film, the beloved franchise reappears in theaters for “Now You See Me: Now You Don’t.” With this new act, fans receive the nostalgia of the original two films but not necessarily their riveting twists and turns.
The third installment of the “Now You See Me” franchise features familiar faces such as J. Daniel Atlas (Jesse Eisenberg), Jack Wilder (Dave Franco) and Marritt McKinney (Woody Harrelson). Henley Reeves (Isla Fisher) also returns to the screen after her character was noticeably absent from the second movie.
The story follows the now-separated Horsemen, who enlist the help of amateur magicians — Charlie (Justice Smith), Bosco (Dominic Sessa) and June (Ariana Greenblatt) — when the secret magic society, the Eye, sends each of the original members tarot cards, which reveal a map when the four are reunited and their cards put together.
They are tasked with stealing “The Heart,” the largest diamond in the world, which Veronika Vanderberg (Rosamund Pike), head of a South African mining diamond company that launders money for wealthy criminals, owns. The Horsemen must take down Veronika, who inherited the company from her former Nazi father, and stop her illegal activities.
The film’s famous line, “The closer you look, the less you see,” can similarly be applied to an examination of its quality. Although the storyline introduces new characters and implausible acts, upon further inspection, the movie is predictable and nostalgia-reliant.
Immediately, it becomes obvious that Smith, Sessa and Greenblatt are poised to be the Horsemen’s successors and the face of magic for a new generation. Although the concept is an interesting start to revamping the franchise, the execution is too predictable.
Compared to the emotional performances from Sessa and Smith in “The Holdovers” (2023) and “I Saw the TV Glow” (2024), respectively, the pair’s acting in this film is comparable to cringey Disney Channel delivery. The younger actors’ dialogue is made up of quips and sarcasm that make one question whether or not the writer has ever heard a teenager speak.
The trio repeatedly mentions that they are big fans of the Horsemen, yet they constantly question every decision they make and argue in favor of their naivete. When June is taken by the authorities, Bosco claims he is going to rescue her and argues with Henley and Atlas when they try to talk him down. It is only after Atlas tells him that he will also be arrested if he tries to save her that he concedes, even though that’s extremely obvious.
Each Horseman is also assigned a mentee who perfectly aligns with their respective talents a little too well. Pickpocket June is paired up with pickpocket Jack; cocky Bosco meets his match with cocky Atlas; and secret mastermind Charlie hides from the spotlight, similar to Henley in the first movie. Instead of having both parties teach each other, the younger crew essentially learns nothing from supposed professionals.
For example, in one scene, the group must enter a French chateau with a complicated handleless door made of complex shapes. Jack and June are challenged to see who can open it first. According to the scene, a talented pickpocket, who once faked his own death, cannot figure out that there is no lock to be picked and that the door is obviously a puzzle. Instead, an amateur shows him up, solving a “mind-boggling” puzzle by simply shape matching.
However, the pairings made for entertaining scenes depicting magic tricks. Another scene had every character showcasing their respective magical acts, competing by using different ways to conceal the diamond and illustrating how to use the art of illusion to their advantage. This is one of the few magic scenes on par with the fantastical nature of the first two films. It’s also one of the few unpredictable moments that properly highlight each character’s strengths and weaknesses.
The set design of “Now You See Me: Now You Don’t” is by far the best of the series. Aside from its unique door, the French chateau is full of rooms that display a classic magical illusion. From a slanted, perspective-warping piano room to a hallway of paintings that literally flip upside down, each room’s uncanny features made for great fight scenes between the magicians and law enforcement.
The magic itself is still as implausible and impossible as ever, but in all honesty, that ridiculousness is what makes the franchise so memorable. Marritt utilizes his classically impressive hypnosis to incapacitate a handful of security guards, and Lula May (Lizzy Caplan) returns with her delightfully gory tricks, making her arm fall off, although the two are severely underutilized in this film compared to their predecessors.
Uncommonly for a sequel, when the movie took advantage of nostalgia, it genuinely made the plot more enjoyable. Whether that be through suspenseful callbacks, such as a glass box filling with water or a fake room reveal, “Now You See Me: Now You Don’t” illustrates that an old dog really doesn’t need to learn new tricks.
That’s also not to say all the new implementations were unnecessary. Pike’s performance as Veronika stood out brilliantly, and her villainess was a refreshing addition to the complicated heist. The Gen Z Horsemen made for an exciting plot twist and potential for the franchise’s future if the dialogue improves and their characters continue to develop with the series.
The film closes with a surprise cameo from a familiar character, hinting at another potential sequel. Whether or not audiences care about bad dialogue and recycled gimmicks, the “Now You See Me” franchise continues to be a magical hit that is ridiculous in the best way.
We are the only independent newspaper here at USC, run at every level by students. That means we aren’t tied down by any other interests but those of readers like you: the students, faculty, staff and South Central residents that together make up the USC community.
Independence is a double-edged sword: We have a unique lens into the University’s actions and policies, and can hold powerful figures accountable when others cannot. But that also means our budget is severely limited. We’re already spread thin as we compensate the writers, photographers, artists, designers and editors whose incredible work you see in our paper; as we work to revamp and expand our digital presence, we now have additional staff making podcasts, videos, webpages, our first ever magazine and social media content, who are at risk of being unable to receive the support they deserve.
We are therefore indebted to readers like you, who, by supporting us, help keep our paper independent, free and widely accessible.
Please consider supporting us. Even $1 goes a long way in supporting our work; if you are able, you can also support us with monthly, or even annual, donations. Thank you.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept settingsDo Not AcceptWe may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.
If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Google reCaptcha Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:
The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:
