Eight gubernatorial candidates debate at California Science Center
The event discussed immigration enforcement, Medi-Cal cuts and federal funding.
The event discussed immigration enforcement, Medi-Cal cuts and federal funding.

Eight candidates vying to replace California Gov. Gavin Newsom participated in a forum at the California Science Center on Saturday morning, where they answered questions about how they would handle United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement involvement in the state, Medi-Cal cuts and federal funding.
With Newsom termed out, over a dozen candidates have emerged in a wide-open race to become the 41st governor of California. Some of the candidates, including former Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra and Congressional Rep. Eric Swalwell, attended Saturday’s forum, while others, like former Congressional Rep. Katie Porter, Fox News contributor Steve Hilton and Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, did not.
December preliminary polling from Emerson College showed Republicans Bianco and Hilton leading the pack, with 13% and 12% respectively. Swallwell and Porter were close behind, with 12% and 11% respectively. However, the largest group of voters, 31%, said they were still undecided and a large pool of Democrat candidates split the remaining votes.
The forum was organized by the Empowerment Congress, a group formed after the 1992 L.A. riots to encourage civic participation among African Americans. According to a message played before the event, the forum’s goal was to advocate for accountability and transparency in politics, improve quality of life, promote social justice and pursue equity in resources.
Seven Democratic candidates and businessman Jon Slavet, the sole Republican attendee, made up the panel.
The recent highly publicized killings around the country by ICE agents, such as the killings of Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis and of Keith Porter Jr. in Northridge by an off-duty ICE agent, prompted a question about how the candidates would handle violence by ICE. Most of the Democratic candidates agreed on taking some sort of legal action against ICE.
Democratic candidate Ian Calderon, former California State Assembly majority leader, said he would direct the state’s attorney general to file criminal charges against any ICE agent who comes into California and breaks state laws.
State Superintendent Tony Thurmond agreed with Calderon and added that he would sue the Trump administration while working to keep ICE agents out of classrooms and hospitals. Swalwell said that he would tackle ICE by enforcing laws on battery, false imprisonment and murder as well as rescinding agents’ driver’s licenses.
“My message as governor to ICE agents is this: If you harm a single Californian, hire the best lawyer you can afford, because I will bring you to justice,” Swalwell said.
However, Slavet took a different approach to ICE and said he would cut a deal with Trump that would involve ending California’s status as a sanctuary state, which means that it does not allow private immigration detention facilities and immigration-related arrests in or around courthouses.
“Sanctuary state status is a moral hazard and encourages people to get coyotes[human smugglers who sneak people across the border] and to come and risk their lives. We should end it. In return, we will restore sovereignty for [the] state of California and return peace to our streets,” Slavet said.
In July, Congress slashed roughly $1 trillion from Medicaid, with the cuts and new restrictions on eligibility projected to push about 3.4 million Californians off of their medical coverage. At the forum, candidates were asked what they would do in response to Medi-Cal cuts and their positions on healthcare.
The singular Republican and seven Democrats disagreed on whether or not undocumented immigrants should have the right to healthcare.
Slavet said he believes that healthcare should not be funded for undocumented immigrants, and he would work to fund healthcare only for Californian citizens. On the other hand, the seven Democratic candidates said they would support universal healthcare, offering several different ways to secure funding.
Tom Steyer, a billionaire businessman, said he would take on special interest groups and corporations to raise revenue for healthcare, whereas Swalwell said he would work toward establishing research funds to invest in healthcare and therefore lower healthcare costs.
Thurmond said that he would support plans for universal healthcare by increasing taxes on billionaires in order to raise revenue.
Former California State Controller Betty Yee said she would ensure healthcare access by growing the healthcare workforce in California so that there are no healthcare deserts where people have to travel far in order to access hospitals, and by issuing state-independent audits for Medi-Cal.
After the forum, the Daily Trojan asked Calderon, Slavet, Yee and Antonio Villaraigosa, former mayor of Los Angeles, about how they would deal with federal funding cuts to higher education.
Throughout the past year, the Trump administration has threatened federal funding to universities, including a list of demands sent to USC and other universities in the October compact, which USC rejected. Accepting the compact would have reportedly given universities preferred access to federal funding in exchange for implementing policies like capping international student enrollment.
Calderon said he would come up with creative ways to generate revenue such as new investment programs as well as building more colleges to make higher education more accessible.
“I don’t want to be under anyone’s thumb,” Calderon said in an interview with the Daily Trojan. “I don’t want to be relying on the federal government, subject to their inability to reasonably govern.”
Slavet again said he would cut a deal with Trump when asked about funding for universities, saying he would eliminate sanctuary-state status in order to increase state sovereignty.
“In return, we have sovereignty of our state, we run our state,” Slavet said.
In order to make higher education more accessible and affordable, Yee said that she would increase the amount of transfer programs in the state and advocate for service requirements to work down student loan debt. Yee also said she would continue to stand against Trump’s threats to higher education because of the importance of the exchange of ideas in academic institutions.
We are the only independent newspaper here at USC, run at every level by students. That means we aren’t tied down by any other interests but those of readers like you: the students, faculty, staff and South Central residents that together make up the USC community.
Independence is a double-edged sword: We have a unique lens into the University’s actions and policies, and can hold powerful figures accountable when others cannot. But that also means our budget is severely limited. We’re already spread thin as we compensate the writers, photographers, artists, designers and editors whose incredible work you see in our paper; as we work to revamp and expand our digital presence, we now have additional staff making podcasts, videos, webpages, our first ever magazine and social media content, who are at risk of being unable to receive the support they deserve.
We are therefore indebted to readers like you, who, by supporting us, help keep our paper independent, free and widely accessible.
Please consider supporting us. Even $1 goes a long way in supporting our work; if you are able, you can also support us with monthly, or even annual, donations. Thank you.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept settingsDo Not AcceptWe may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.
If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Google reCaptcha Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:
The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:
