Track and field shows out at Stan Scott Invite
The men’s squad ran the fastest 4×400-meter time in the country.
The men’s squad ran the fastest 4×400-meter time in the country.
Following a strong performance in last week’s season opener at the Spokane Sports Showcase, the Trojan track and field team continued its success at the Stan Scott Invite in Lubbock, Texas, on Friday, with both the men’s and women’s squads each winning four events.
Coming off last year’s impressive indoor season, which saw the men take home an NCAA championship and the women earn a third-place finish, USC’s early results indicate both squads could again contend for a national title.
“We have some really good bright spots, and then we have some other spots where we need to continue to work,” said USC Track and Field Director Quincy Watts, the 2025 NCAA Men’s Coach of the Year. “That’s what these early meets are for.”
One of the most exciting performances of the day came in the last event: the men’s 4×400-meter relay. Fighting against Ohio State in a close race from the start, senior sprinter William Jones closed with a 44.13 split to give the Trojans a victory and the fastest time in the country this season.
Senior sprinters Jaelen Knox and Garrett Kaalund — Kaalund was last week’s Big Ten Co-Athlete of the Week — along with freshman Jack Stadlman rounded out the victorious four-man squad. The Trojan’s 4×400-meter B team, made up of Jacob Andrews, Nickolas Miller, Chase McCallum and Wiaan Martin, finished less than eight seconds behind and earned a fifth-place finish.
Another highlight for the men came in the 60-meter final. Junior Edward Nketia took home the title, running 6.58 seconds — a top-10 time nationally this season. Kaalund and freshman Cordial Vann secured second and third place, running 6.61 and 6.62, respectively.
Sophomore distance runner Chase McCallum earned another title for the Trojans in the 800-meter final. Running in second place until the final 200 meters, Chase outsprinted Texas Tech’s Fikadu Gonzalez en route to a 1:49.92 time. McCallum’s performance was nearly four seconds faster than his 1:53.82 time at last week’s meet.
Sophomore Kaden Garland served as USC’s only representative of the men’s team in the field events, managing to win the shot-put competition with a throw of 16.74 meters and giving the men’s squad its fourth first-place medal.
The women’s squad also secured four first-place finishes, but none of these wins were as dominant as Oluwatosin Awoleye’s performance in the 800-meter final. Awoleye ran 2:08:83, beating the second-place finisher — Lubbock Christian University freshman Isabella Jaime, who ran 2:21.13 — by over 12 seconds.
After just the first 200 meters, Awoleye began to separate from the field and led the rest of the way, racing only against the clock.
“She’s been winning by 50 to 60 meters,” Watts said. “She’s just waiting on some competition.”
USC’s women placed well in the short sprints, winning the 60-meter and 60-meter hurdle finals. In the 60-meter, sophomore Brianna Selby posted a time of 7.21 seconds to win the title with a top-10 time in the country this season. Fellow sophomores Rachael Uvieghara and Olivia Pace rounded out the race with fourth- and fifth-place finishes, respectively.
In the 60-meter hurdles, graduate sprinter Asjah Atkinson edged Texas Tech’s Symoria Adkins by 0.05 seconds, winning with a time of 8.18. Junior Nonah Waldron also earned points in the event, placing fourth overall.
The final gold medal for the women came at the hands of sophomore thrower Ashley Erasmus. She threw for 16.67 meters in the shot put, beating second place by over 2 and a half meters.
“The competition is getting better and better each week,” Watts said. “I like the trend that I’m seeing. It’s the same trend that we had last year. [Our men and women’s teams] are getting better and better each week.”
The track and field team will be back in action Friday at the DeLoss Dodds Invite hosted by Kansas State.
We are the only independent newspaper here at USC, run at every level by students. That means we aren’t tied down by any other interests but those of readers like you: the students, faculty, staff and South Central residents that together make up the USC community.
Independence is a double-edged sword: We have a unique lens into the University’s actions and policies, and can hold powerful figures accountable when others cannot. But that also means our budget is severely limited. We’re already spread thin as we compensate the writers, photographers, artists, designers and editors whose incredible work you see in our paper; as we work to revamp and expand our digital presence, we now have additional staff making podcasts, videos, webpages, our first ever magazine and social media content, who are at risk of being unable to receive the support they deserve.
We are therefore indebted to readers like you, who, by supporting us, help keep our paper independent, free and widely accessible.
Please consider supporting us. Even $1 goes a long way in supporting our work; if you are able, you can also support us with monthly, or even annual, donations. Thank you.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept settingsDo Not AcceptWe may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.
If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Google reCaptcha Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:
The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:
