Gould students oppose ICE recruitment at school job fair
An open letter to the school has been signed by 26 student organizations.
An open letter to the school has been signed by 26 student organizations.

The USC Latinx Law Students Association released a statement Wednesday condemning the Gould School of Law for permitting Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection to participate in Gould career recruitment events.
ICE and CBP attended a virtual recruiting event that also featured over 100 other legal employers, Gould Dean Franita Tolson confirmed in a statement to the Daily Trojan on Monday. The Daily Trojan could not confirm the date of the recruiting event.
“Granting them access to USC Gould recruitment infrastructure legitimizes an agency whose core function is the surveillance, detention, and deportation of our friends, family, neighbors, and community members through coercive and violent means,” the LLSA statement read.
At the time of publication, the statement had been signed by 25 other law-focused student organizations, as well as 23 members of Gould’s faculty — 11 of whom signed using only their initials.
In her statement, Tolson wrote that law students have a diverse range of career interests and have the option to pursue their individual professional goals.
“Providing professional support is a top priority at our law school, and likewise providing student support and care — including from me — is a vital priority as well,” Tolson wrote. “Should any Gould student, at any time, have concerns about our law school community, they are always welcome to reach out to me about it.”
Alejandro Valdivia, a member of the Latinx Law Students Association and a juris doctor candidate at Gould, said a key reason behind the letter was because the group felt unsatisfied with Tolson’s response to complaints from students.
“We decided to start the letter because we saw that there was nothing being done,” Valdivia said.
Valdivia also said that ICE and CBP do not meet Gould’s recruiting guidelines. According to Gould’s employer acknowledgement guidelines, employers participating in recruitment events must provide a space free of discrimination and harassment. Valdivia did not specify which policies he believes the federal immigration agencies violate.
While ICE and CBP were not physically present on campus, the Latinx Law Students Association statement said the virtual format did not change their opposition and called on Gould to sever all recruiting ties with both agencies.
One of the original statement’s signatories was the American Constitution Society, which wrote in a statement to the Daily Trojan that Gould allowing ICE recruitment was “inappropriate.”
“We, as USC Gould’s American Constitution Society, are disappointed that USC Gould is not upholding the values they purport to be instilling in us by claiming their hands were tied and refusing to bar [the Department of Homeland Security], ICE and CBP from USC Gould’s recruitment activities,” the American Constitution Society’s statement read.
While not all law organizations signed the letter, other groups have issued their own statements on ICE and CBP’s presence at the school’s recruitment events. One of these is the USC Immigration Clinic, a pro bono program run by students and faculty that provides legal representation to immigrants.
“Lawyers working for ICE and CBP are furthering and facilitating this campaign of fear and terror,” the USC Immigration Clinic wrote in a statement posted to Instagram on Wednesday. “While we disagree with the decision to allow DHS to recruit our students through our hiring programs, we still believe that USC administrators are trying to do what is best for the university.”
The Legal Studies Student Association, which did not sign the letter, also criticized the decision in an Instagram post, calling Gould’s allowance of ICE and CBP recruitment “deeply troubling.” The association called on administrators to acknowledge the harm caused by the agencies’ presence and to engage directly with students who voiced their concerns.
Other law schools have faced similar pushback. At Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, ICE backed out of participating in a recruitment event in response to student protests, according to the State Press, ASU’s student publication.
We are the only independent newspaper here at USC, run at every level by students. That means we aren’t tied down by any other interests but those of readers like you: the students, faculty, staff and South Central residents that together make up the USC community.
Independence is a double-edged sword: We have a unique lens into the University’s actions and policies, and can hold powerful figures accountable when others cannot. But that also means our budget is severely limited. We’re already spread thin as we compensate the writers, photographers, artists, designers and editors whose incredible work you see in our paper; as we work to revamp and expand our digital presence, we now have additional staff making podcasts, videos, webpages, our first ever magazine and social media content, who are at risk of being unable to receive the support they deserve.
We are therefore indebted to readers like you, who, by supporting us, help keep our paper independent, free and widely accessible.
Please consider supporting us. Even $1 goes a long way in supporting our work; if you are able, you can also support us with monthly, or even annual, donations. Thank you.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept settingsDo Not AcceptWe may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.
If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Google reCaptcha Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:
The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:
