Daily Trojan A&E staff picks Academy Awards
“Sinners” and “One Battle After Another” are expected to fight it out at the Oscars.
“Sinners” and “One Battle After Another” are expected to fight it out at the Oscars.

The 98th Academy Awards will be held Sunday, with blockbuster hits released within 2025 like “Sinners,” “One Battle After Another,” “Hamnet” and many others receiving multiple nominations. With many of these projects nominated across the big three awards — Best Picture, Actor in a Leading Role and Directing — the 2026 Oscars are sure to be contentious.
Who will sweep the categories this year? The Daily Trojan’s senior film reporters have placed their bets on who will take home this year’s Oscars.
The race for best actor at the Oscars is tighter than ever this year. Leonardo DiCaprio seeks to take home his second win in the category, while Ethan Hawke, Michael B. Jordan, Timothée Chalamet and Wagner Moura fight for their first win in the category.
However, the race has shrunk to a two-party contest between Chalamet for his role as Marty Mauser in “Marty Supreme” and Jordan for his dual role as twins Smoke and Stack in “Sinners.”
Even though Chalamet’s meticulousness shone through to make “Marty Supreme” one of 2025’s most compelling watches, Jordan was the beast that sparked a bigger cultural moment — a two-headed beast at that. Jordan has long been Ryan Coogler’s go-to lead actor, but his captivating portrayal of two identical, but polar-opposite twins might be the “Creed” (2015) star’s most impressive performance yet.
— Kailen Hicks, Arts & Entertainment Staff Writer
Jessie Buckley’s performance as Agnes in “Hamnet” was not only phenomenal but a love letter to theater and acting as an art form. The Irish actress has already earned herself the Critics’ Choice Award for Best Actress, and there’s a strong chance she’ll win the Academy over too.
Buckley’s performance truly captured the beauty and suffering of both womanhood and motherhood. Besides her excellent line delivery, the actress’ subtleties — thoughtful glances, acting with the eyes, physical choices — illustrated that Buckley is a genuine master of her craft. The heartbreaking scene of Agnes mourning the death of her son, screaming and clutching his body, is haunting and unforgettably so.
The film’s deeply emotional narrative would not have been executed half as beautifully or gut-wrenchingly without her presence.
— Sophia Kang, Assistant Arts & Entertainment Editor
This is Paul Thomas Anderson’s year. The critically acclaimed filmmaker has been nominated for an Academy Award 14 times — including four Best Director nods — but has yet to take home an Oscar statuette. “One Battle After Another” is his long-awaited time to shine.
Anderson’s direction completely transforms the sprawling 161-minute epic about political extremism and resistance into a fast-paced exploit. It’s not just a good movie; it’s fun to watch.
A hallmark of Anderson’s filmography is his dynamic cinematography, influenced by cinéma vérité. Through his character-driven lens, the bleak, post-revolutionary dystopia of “One Battle After Another” becomes something entirely new and terrifying.
— Fiona Feingold, Arts & Entertainment Columnist
Ryan Coogler’s screenplay for “Sinners” fits the most literal interpretation of “original screenplay.” Its canvas is wide, exploring and twisting ideas from horror films, musicals and period dramas.
The story also knocks a big swing out of the park in jamming its constrained 24-hour timeframe into a strange two-act structure. Coogler splits his movie’s runtime more or less evenly between the film’s methodical character study and vampire extravaganza.
If there’s anything that clinched the screenplay Oscar for “Sinners,” however, it would have to be its centerpiece “juke joint” scene. In the scene, centuries of musical history are dropped into a stunning musical sequence. Without the screenplay’s gripping, page-long description of this sequence, a defining cultural moment of 2025 would have never hit the screen.
— Sammy Bovitz, Arts & Entertainment Staff Writer
This year’s Academy Awards season has seen some of the most heated Best Picture debates in recent years — and for good reason. 2025 saw the release of a myriad of instant classics; films like “Hamnet,” “Sinners,” “Marty Supreme” and “Sentimental Value” would all be deserving of the Best Picture title any other year, yet this year, they’re all expected to go head-to-head. However, one film rises above the rest.
Paul Thomas Anderson’s “One Battle After Another” is a relentless, mesmerizing masterpiece, and a timely, almost prescient marker in both popular culture and political conversation. The film showcases recalcitrant activist attitudes and their effects — for better and worse — through clever cinematography, witty writing, impeccable casting and stellar performances from the entire cast, especially Sean Penn and Benicio Del Toro.
This semi-Orwellian prophecy foretells a future already upon us, and poses this position in an epic, nimble satire. Aside from celebrating the deserving film’s infinite cinematic victories, a “One Battle” win would be apposite given the current climate.
— Aubrie Cole, Arts & Entertainment Columnist
The Academy Awards will take place Sunday at the Dolby Theatre at Ovation Hollywood in Los Angeles at 4 p.m. PDT. It will also be broadcast live on ABC and Hulu.
We are the only independent newspaper here at USC, run at every level by students. That means we aren’t tied down by any other interests but those of readers like you: the students, faculty, staff and South Central residents that together make up the USC community.
Independence is a double-edged sword: We have a unique lens into the University’s actions and policies, and can hold powerful figures accountable when others cannot. But that also means our budget is severely limited. We’re already spread thin as we compensate the writers, photographers, artists, designers and editors whose incredible work you see in our paper; as we work to revamp and expand our digital presence, we now have additional staff making podcasts, videos, webpages, our first ever magazine and social media content, who are at risk of being unable to receive the support they deserve.
We are therefore indebted to readers like you, who, by supporting us, help keep our paper independent, free and widely accessible.
Please consider supporting us. Even $1 goes a long way in supporting our work; if you are able, you can also support us with monthly, or even annual, donations. Thank you.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept settingsDo Not AcceptWe may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.
If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Google reCaptcha Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:
The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:
