No. 4 beach volleyball splits at Best in the West tournament
USC started strong before falling to No. 2 UCLA, which it has yet to defeat this season.
USC started strong before falling to No. 2 UCLA, which it has yet to defeat this season.

The sunny shores of Laguna Beach set the stage for the Best in the West tournament once again. No. 4 USC (23-6), last year’s champion, entered looking to defend its title.
After starting the year on a high note at the Outrigger Classic, including a win over No. 1 Stanford (27-2), the Trojans have struggled to defeat top teams, including the Cardinal and No. 2 UCLA (21-4). Still, the Trojans combined for only two losses in 10 matches with successful trips to Florida and Texas in March.
The Trojans entered the tournament ready for revenge against the Bruins, but ultimately fell apart despite an early strong showing.
Day 1 dominance
USC opened the tournament against No. 6 Cal Poly (21-5) and No. 10 Long Beach State (18-10). In the tournament opener, the Trojans defeated Cal Poly 3-2.
In their first time facing Long Beach State this year, some Trojan pairs dominated, while other pairs struggled.
The No. 5 pair of freshman Kyra Zaengle and sophomore Calinda Kok put USC on the board first, with their dominant win over redshirt freshmen Madi Collins and Victoria Henkel. However, freshman Bella Satterwhite and graduate student Kerry Keefe struggled against the Beach, losing their match rather swiftly.
Following that result, the No. 2 and No. 4 pairs of USC dominated their opponents, securing the overall match win of the Best in the West Tournament for the Trojans.
In the final matchup of the duel, No. 1 pair junior Zoey Henson and freshman Sarah Wood pushed their match to three sets, going extra time, but just barely fell short in the third, 21-19, 26-28, 15-12.
Later in the day, USC continued its strong play against Cal Poly. Cal Poly suffered a tough loss against UCLA just hours before playing USC, and the Mustangs could not turn it around.
USC’s No. 1 and 3 pairs finished in straight sets to control the dual; however, USC’s No. 2 pair was completely dominated by the Mustangs, unable to take a set.
The No. 5 pair of Zaengle and Kok went the distance, coming back from a first-set deficit (14-21, 21-13, 15-11). Their win secured the second straight overall win for the Trojans on the day and put them in a strong position entering Day 2.
Day 2 defeat
Despite having two wins against ranked opponents on the first day, the Trojans were unable to maintain their momentum and fell to both of their opponents on the second day of the tournament.
In the opening tournament of the year, USC defeated Stanford but fell to UCLA.
This time around, USC lost to Stanford, with only Zaengle and Kok pushing their match to three sets. Stanford dominated USC at every pair, leaving it no room to repeat its earlier win from the opening match of the season in Hawaii.
Seeking redemption and their first win against UCLA this season, the Trojans closed the tournament against their crosstown rival.
At first, things were looking good for USC. Juniors Madison Goellner and Kaileigh Truslow, a newer pair, got it done for the Trojans, securing the first point. After that, No. 2 pair junior Ashley Pater and sophomore Kennedy Coakley defeated their UCLA pair quickly, putting the Trojans up by two matches.
However, the Trojans’ dreams of defeat were quickly shut down as the remaining three USC pairs fell to give the Bruins a 3-2 victory and their second rivalry win of the season.
After a disappointing end to the Best in the West Tournament, USC will travel to San Luis Obispo for the Center of Effort Challenge this Friday and Saturday. The Trojans will face all-too-familiar opponents, including Stanford, No. 7 TCU (32-5) and No. 8 Loyola Marymount University (22-6).
We are the only independent newspaper here at USC, run at every level by students. That means we aren’t tied down by any other interests but those of readers like you: the students, faculty, staff and South Central residents that together make up the USC community.
Independence is a double-edged sword: We have a unique lens into the University’s actions and policies, and can hold powerful figures accountable when others cannot. But that also means our budget is severely limited. We’re already spread thin as we compensate the writers, photographers, artists, designers and editors whose incredible work you see in our paper; as we work to revamp and expand our digital presence, we now have additional staff making podcasts, videos, webpages, our first ever magazine and social media content, who are at risk of being unable to receive the support they deserve.
We are therefore indebted to readers like you, who, by supporting us, help keep our paper independent, free and widely accessible.
Please consider supporting us. Even $1 goes a long way in supporting our work; if you are able, you can also support us with monthly, or even annual, donations. Thank you.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept settingsDo Not AcceptWe may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.
If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Google reCaptcha Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:
The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:
