No. 4 beach volleyball upsets No. 1 Stanford at Center of Effort Challenge
The Trojans lost just one match over the weekend, finishing in second place.
The Trojans lost just one match over the weekend, finishing in second place.

Fresh off a 2-2 split in the Best in the West Tournament, the Trojans traveled to San Luis Obispo in hopes of redemption and to chase more wins against top 10 teams.
This season, the Trojans currently sit undefeated at home and have split several matches against ranked opponents. The Center of Effort Challenge had No. 4 USC (26-7) slated to face four familiar opponents in No. 1 Stanford (30-3), No. 8 TCU (16-9), No. 7 LMU (22-10) and No. 2 UCLA (25-4).
Despite the Trojans having already been acquainted with these opponents, they weren’t able to secure the overall tournament win over the Bruins, yet again.
Upset on Day 1
Having split the series against Stanford this season, the Trojans were seeking to add a win following Stanford’s sheer dominance last weekend, resulting in every pair losing to the Cardinal.
The No. 1 pair of sophomore Kennedy Coakley and junior Zoey Henson swiftly defeated Stanford’s No. 1 pair, senior Kelly Belardi and sophomore Avery Jackson. But USC’s No. 3 pair fell to the Cardinal, putting a win in each team’s pocket.
The match at the No. 2 pair went the distance, but didn’t go the Trojans’ way. The newer pair, freshman Sarah Wood and junior Ashley Pater, lost their match in their first time playing together. But the loss wasn’t enough to quell the Trojans as the No. 4 and 5 pairs got it done for USC, dominating their opponents to secure an upset win.
Following the exciting upset, USC faced TCU, which has lost every contest against the Trojans this season.
Freshman Bella Satterwhite and graduate student Kerry Keefe, who normally play at the No. 3 pair, were promoted to the No. 2 pair this weekend and battled with the Horned Frogs, but ultimately fell in three sets.
Still, even with the changes and two set losses, the Trojans took the overall win over TCU, finishing a strong first day.
USC falls to crosstown rival on Day 2
USC opened day two of the tournament against LMU. In their second meeting this season, USC was looking to take home another win.
Despite No. 1 and No. 2 pairs exchanging partners for the Trojans, both dominated their matches, giving USC an early lead in the duel.
Freshman Kyra Zaengle and sophomore Calinda Kok at the No. 4 pair lost the first set of their match, but immediately turned it around in the second set, dominating sophomore Maja Kruczek and freshman Josefine Schaekel and winning the overall match.
Junior Madison Goellner and junior Kaileigh Truslow at the No. 5 pair completed the sweep in a drawn-out battle. The match went to three sets, with the pair just barely securing the win in the third set, 19-21, 21-19, 15-13.
USC’s win against LMU slated the Trojans to face their crosstown rival for the third time this season. The Trojans have not been able to beat UCLA all year, and this competition was no different.
The loss was set in stone early as the No. 1, 2 and 3 pairs all fell to UCLA. The No. 3 pair was the only pair to lose and go the distance, but it was to no avail.
Zaengle and Kok pushed their match to three after losing a very extended first set, and never looked back. They dominated the second set and used that momentum to pick up the individual win. Goellner and Truslow continued to play consistently against UCLA, once again dominating their match in straight sets.
With the overall loss to the Bruins, the Trojans finished the Center of Effort Challenge in second place.
USC will have another opportunity to redeem itself against UCLA during their final match at home on Thursday at noon.
We are the only independent newspaper here at USC, run at every level by students. That means we aren’t tied down by any other interests but those of readers like you: the students, faculty, staff and South Central residents that together make up the USC community.
Independence is a double-edged sword: We have a unique lens into the University’s actions and policies, and can hold powerful figures accountable when others cannot. But that also means our budget is severely limited. We’re already spread thin as we compensate the writers, photographers, artists, designers and editors whose incredible work you see in our paper; as we work to revamp and expand our digital presence, we now have additional staff making podcasts, videos, webpages, our first ever magazine and social media content, who are at risk of being unable to receive the support they deserve.
We are therefore indebted to readers like you, who, by supporting us, help keep our paper independent, free and widely accessible.
Please consider supporting us. Even $1 goes a long way in supporting our work; if you are able, you can also support us with monthly, or even annual, donations. Thank you.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept settingsDo Not AcceptWe may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.
If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Google reCaptcha Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:
The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:
