Women’s water polo looks to finally finish job at NCAA Tournament
No. 3 USC has lost in the tournament’s final round in three of the past four seasons.
No. 3 USC has lost in the tournament’s final round in three of the past four seasons.

The script is starting to get stale for USC women’s water polo.
The Trojans tear through the country for three months — outside of the occasional loss to a conference rival — re-cementing their status as one of the top teams in the sport. They earn a top-3 seed in the NCAA Tournament and play their way to the championship round. Then, one win from a national title, they lose.
This has been the story for USC in three of the past four years, aside from a disappointing 2024 campaign when the Trojans lost in the quarterfinals. After winning five national titles in 12 seasons from 2010 to 2021, USC’s norm has become getting close but going home empty-handed, failing time and time again to finish the job.
However, this year’s squad may finally be the one to bring a championship back to the cardinal and gold. The No. 2 Trojans (22-3, 6-0 MPSF) are led by the MPSF Player of the Year, sophomore attacker Emily Ausmus. They have a veteran-heavy roster with an abundance of postseason experience.
Most importantly, they boast wins over every major contender in the NCAA field — including the top seed, No. 1 Stanford (14-1, 5-1), which dashed their hopes of an MPSF title just two weeks ago.
Though the road ahead is far from easy, USC has proven itself capable of handling the toughest competition the tournament has to offer. With just three more wins, the Trojans would take home their first national championship since 2021, returning to their typical place atop the collegiate water polo landscape.
USC’s quest for the crown will begin with No. 6 Loyola Marymount University (23-4, 6-0 Golden Coast Conference), which the Trojans hold a 33-0 record against all-time. While the Lions are unlikely to pose a considerable threat in the quarterfinals, they still possess a dangerous lineup for USC to be wary of.
Offensively, LMU is spearheaded by graduate utility Anna Tarantino and freshman utility Emison Styris, who lead the team with 40 and 39 goals, respectively. Styris also has the second-most assists at 34, while Tarantino has racked up 15 steals across the season.
The Lions’ primary strength, however, is their goalkeeping: Freshman Madison Searle has allowed fewer than eight goals per game on a 56.2% save percentage, both of which trounce the respective numbers from USC’s primary goalkeeper, redshirt sophomore Anna Reed. The Trojans will likely need to take considerably more shots than LMU if they want to overcome the gap protecting the net.
After the Lions, the Trojans will likely await a rivalry match with No. 3 UCLA (20-4, 4-2 MPSF). The crosstown rivals have already faced off three times this year; while the Bruins took the first two nonconference matchups, USC bounced back in the regular-season finale to claim the MPSF Tournament’s No. 1 seed.
The Trojans’ key to advancing will simply be staying consistent on offense: In each of the two losses, they scored just nine goals, the only times this season in which they’ve been held to single digits. In contrast, USC scored 13 in its regular-season finale win, thanks in large part to a five-goal performance from Ausmus.
The defense will also need to prevent UCLA’s star players from getting hot. The Trojans’ two losses featured five- and six-goal outbursts from senior attacker Taylor Smith and senior utility Bia Mantellato, respectively, both of whom were held to just two in USC’s win.
If the Trojans can make it past the Bruins, they’ll be rewarded with their seventh championship appearance in the last eight tournaments, where they will likely play against either No. 4 UC Berkeley (14-7, 3-3) or Stanford.
Though Cal has gone 0-7 against the top three teams in the field this season, making a run to the finals unlikely, the Golden Bears have won every other game and are still more than capable of hanging around, with two one-goal losses to UCLA and another such loss to the Cardinal. In fact, their worst showings have come against USC, which has bested them by at least three goals in all three matchups this year.
In the squads’ most recent meeting, the Trojans won behind a balanced attack from their stars, with four different players recording hat tricks. USC capitalized on a rough outing from Golden Bear redshirt sophomore goalkeeper Talia Fonseca, who saved just six of the 23 shots on goal; if the Trojans can find that level of offensive efficiency again, they’ll be well on their way to a championship.
However, the more likely — and dangerous — outcome is a rematch with Stanford. The teams split their two meetings this season: USC pulled off a last-second 11-10 win in the regular season, but the Cardinal got their revenge in the MPSF Tournament final.
The Trojans pulled off their miracle regular-season victory, which remains Stanford’s only loss this season, behind a stellar showing from their defense. USC held the Cardinal to just 14 shots on goal — a number that ballooned to 23 in the conference championship — and clamped down as the match went on, allowing only three goals in the second half.
A second victory over the country’s No. 1 team would require a precise combination of stalwart defense and timely offense, but the Trojans have already shown they’re up to the task — they just need to rediscover the magic that propelled them earlier in the season.
Before USC can think about the final, however, it needs to get there. That pursuit will begin against LMU in La Jolla on Friday at 6 p.m.
We are the only independent newspaper here at USC, run at every level by students. That means we aren’t tied down by any other interests but those of readers like you: the students, faculty, staff and South Central residents that together make up the USC community.
Independence is a double-edged sword: We have a unique lens into the University’s actions and policies, and can hold powerful figures accountable when others cannot. But that also means our budget is severely limited. We’re already spread thin as we compensate the writers, photographers, artists, designers and editors whose incredible work you see in our paper; as we work to revamp and expand our digital presence, we now have additional staff making podcasts, videos, webpages, our first ever magazine and social media content, who are at risk of being unable to receive the support they deserve.
We are therefore indebted to readers like you, who, by supporting us, help keep our paper independent, free and widely accessible.
Please consider supporting us. Even $1 goes a long way in supporting our work; if you are able, you can also support us with monthly, or even annual, donations. Thank you.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept settingsDo Not AcceptWe may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.
If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Google reCaptcha Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:
The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:
