DUGOUT DIARIES
How to fix the MLB playoffs
It’s time for baseball’s postseason to go back to some of its roots.
It’s time for baseball’s postseason to go back to some of its roots.


On Tuesday morning, the Philadelphia Phillies and Atlanta Braves faced off in the first game of the 2026 Major League Baseball playoffs, ushering in the fifth year of baseball’s not-so-new 12-team postseason format.
Despite the absence of my beloved St. Louis Cardinals — it’s been a rough few years in the old 314 — you’d better believe I’ll be following every game. And why wouldn’t I? This season’s Wild Card Round alone features some powerhouse matchups, including … the 84-78 Chicago White Sox … against the 81-81 Houston Astros. Huh. That’s really a playoff series?
In a perfect world: no, of course not. A team that lost 102 games last year versus a team that lost half its games this year isn’t my idea of a thrilling playoff experience. In MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred’s world, though, that’s just the way it is.
But why should it be? Baseball fans deserve a high-quality postseason lineup, not a whole series of mediocre American League slop. The sport is better than this.
It’s time to fix the MLB playoffs. Today, I’ll be walking you through my three-step plan to perfect the postseason format, once and for all. Mr. Manfred, I hope you’re paying attention.
Fewer teams in the field
Last year, I briefly complained about how the current team count is too large, and my thoughts on the matter haven’t changed. In a league with only 30 teams, 12 is simply too many to make the playoffs. Proportionally, that’s like if the College Football Playoff had 55 teams instead of 12, or if March Madness featured 146 instead of 76.
Not to sound like an oldhead, but seriously, what’s with the participation trophies? The White Sox making the playoffs after a disastrous three-year stretch is a nice story, I’ll give you that, but they only won 84 games — they’re not exactly my idea of a playoff-caliber team.
This isn’t an isolated incident, either, as the Cincinnati Reds made it in with just 83 wins last year. Unsurprisingly, they got crushed in just two games and promptly flew to Cancun only a couple of days later than they would’ve had they missed the field altogether.
In a sport with such a grueling regular-season schedule, results have to matter. Winning has to matter. You shouldn’t be able to limp through 162 games with a .500 record and still make the postseason.
Thus, when I’m commissioner for a day, I’ll be reducing the number of playoff teams per league from six to four. You want to play in October? Earn it.
No more division champions
In the current era of baseball, where each team plays every other team at least three times, divisions matter less than ever: Across a full season, a given team will play against its division rivals a total of 52 times — less than one-third of their overall schedule. Why, then, are we still placing so much emphasis on winning your division?
The aforementioned 2026 Astros are an extreme example: Despite going an even 81-81, Houston finished with the best record in the AL West, earning an automatic spot in the playoffs as the No. 3 seed. For reference, the New York Yankees, who won 12 more games this year, are seeded No. 4.
It’s not like the Astros beat up on their weak division, either, as they went 26-26 against their AL West opponents. They were a bad team that couldn’t even get the job done against other bad teams. But because they happen to play in a bad division, they still got into the postseason. Make it make sense.
The solution is easy: no more automatic bids for division winners. Instead of letting in each division’s champion — plus a wild-card team or three — simply give it to the four best teams in each league. If that means the worst division in MLB history isn’t represented, so be it.
Every series is best of seven
Why on earth is the Division Series still only best of five? This one feels like the most obvious change of all, yet more than 30 years after the quarterfinal round was introduced, we still haven’t gotten there.
It’s one thing for the Wild Card Series to be a best-of-three format — the original Wild Card was a single game, after all — but when the Championship Series and the World Series are both played to seven games, it’s nonsensical to keep the Division Series at five. Every other major sport maintains a consistent length for each of its postseason series; why not baseball?
In a sport with results as variable as baseball, a five-game series just isn’t enough to determine which team “deserves” to move on — especially in the Division Series, which typically has a larger gap between teams than later rounds. If anything, it might make more sense for the first round to be longer than the rest, as that would allow the better team to win more often.
My final verdict is as follows: The playoff field should feature the four best teams from each league, regardless of their divisions, and each series should be a best-of-seven format. This would be roughly the same amount of postseason baseball we’re getting now, but with stronger teams, fairer matchups and more exciting competition overall.
Oh, and the Cardinals should be in it every year. I almost forgot that part.
Bennett Christofferson is a senior writing about baseball’s biggest stories and controversies in his column, “Dugout Diaries,” which runs every other Thursday. He is also the managing editor at the Daily Trojan.
We are the only independent newspaper here at USC, run at every level by students. That means we aren’t tied down by any other interests but those of readers like you: the students, faculty, staff and South Central residents that together make up the USC community.
Independence is a double-edged sword: We have a unique lens into the University’s actions and policies, and can hold powerful figures accountable when others cannot. But that also means our budget is severely limited. We’re already spread thin as we compensate the writers, photographers, artists, designers and editors whose incredible work you see in our paper; as we work to revamp and expand our digital presence, we now have additional staff making podcasts, videos, webpages, our first ever magazine and social media content, who are at risk of being unable to receive the support they deserve.
We are therefore indebted to readers like you, who, by supporting us, help keep our paper independent, free and widely accessible.
Please consider supporting us. Even $1 goes a long way in supporting our work; if you are able, you can also support us with monthly, or even annual, donations. Thank you.
TRENDING ARTICLES
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept settingsDo Not AcceptWe may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.
If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Google reCaptcha Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:
The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:
