We need an Equal Rights Amendment now more than ever
Reproductive freedom is a fundamental right that must be nationally protected.
Reproductive freedom is a fundamental right that must be nationally protected.

Gloria Steinem, a fearless writer and organizer who pioneered the reproductive freedom movement, passed away Sept. 2. In 1970, Steinem testified before the United States Senate advocating for an Equal Rights Amendment to enshrine gender equality in the Constitution, which, if ratified, would strengthen protections against gender-based violence, workplace discrimination and access to reproductive healthcare.
Since the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, 13 states have enacted total abortion bans, and access to abortion is restricted across more than half of the country. As a result, women nationwide are struggling to safely and conveniently secure access to reproductive healthcare.
In Ohio, a 10-year-old victim of rape was forced to travel to Indiana to receive an abortion. No one should endure a horror to convince lawmakers that they deserve to make decisions about their own bodies.
Californians voted to pass Proposition 1 in 2022, securing reproductive freedom in the state constitution. But women seeking abortions anywhere shouldn’t have to cross state lines to receive care — we need a right to reproductive healthcare at the federal level. As one of the few states with broad reproductive freedom, California must champion a national Equal Rights Amendment, which it adopted as a state in 1972, protecting the right to choose by guaranteeing equality regardless of sex.
In centering a fetus’ supposed stolen future, the right-wing force of anti-abortion lobbyists and politicians conveniently ignore a woman’s potential: a high school or college graduation tassel that will never be turned, a career put on hold. Abortion bans treat women’s bodies as birthing vessels and confine the meaning of their lives to reproduction, reinforcing the patriarchal belief that every woman is destined for motherhood.
Restrictive abortion laws that claim to protect the fetus’ right to life also place women’s health in jeopardy. From Alabama to Texas, states with limited access to abortion experience higher rates of maternal and infant mortality, especially among women of color. For instance, in Texas, doctors were forced to choose between upholding the law and protecting Porsha Ngumezi’s health, ultimately leading to her preventable death.
After the One Big Beautiful Bill Act passed last July, it placed a year-long freeze on Planned Parenthood clinics’ ability to receive Medicaid reimbursements, effectively defunding its health centers.
“Especially in California, [Planned Parenthood was] pretty much hit the hardest out of the country because we had spent the most time and effort ensuring that the largest proportion of people relying on Medi-Cal could go to Planned Parenthood health centers in the state,” said Shelby McMichael, communications director at Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California.
The bill’s defunding impacted more than 100 clinics in California. Planned Parenthood Mar Monte closed five health centers, and clinics in Orange and San Bernardino Counties had to halt primary care services. But in February, California legislature allocated $90 million in emergency funding for Planned Parenthood centers.
“Sometimes we can feel like we are safe in a place like California, but all of the rights and protections that we have secured here in California kind of mean nothing if people can’t access the care that they need,” McMichael said.
Abortion bans are a form of sex-based discrimination, placing not only a woman’s bodily autonomy but the trajectory of her life in the hands of legislators, most of whom are men and will never have to make the incredibly personal decision to terminate a pregnancy. The Equal Rights Amendment explicitly recognizes women’s rights, which should extend to safeguarding clinics that provide abortions like Planned Parenthood from facing another round of defunding.
In 2024, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that abortion providers could challenge the state’s ban on Medicaid coverage for abortion as sex discrimination under the Equal Rights Amendment. A lower state court declared the ban unconstitutional in April.
At the state level, an Equal Rights Amendment protects reproductive rights. But unless this right is outlined in our nation’s Constitution, more and more women will continue to be denied life-saving care.
Reproductive Freedom for All’s California branch is one organization spearheading the fight to strengthen reproductive rights. Some of the nonprofit’s bills currently awaiting Governor Gavin Newsom’s signature include legislation that would create a pathway for veterans and active-duty military members to access abortion care in California as well as a policy to bolster privacy protections surrounding sensitive reproductive health information.
As election season nears, Reproductive Freedom for All endorsed candidates who defend reproductive rights.
“We have to win back the [U.S. House of Representatives], and that’s going to take every single person across the country, [including] our young students on campus in California, getting out to vote to make sure that we elect reproductive freedom champions,” said Pavitra Abraham, director of state campaigns for Reproductive Freedom for All California.
Abortion bans don’t just force a woman to carry a pregnancy to term; they strip away freedom by depriving women of the fundamental right to choose. This November, vote for politicians who will fight for our reproductive rights. Volunteer to phone bank or canvass with organizations like Planned Parenthood and Reproductive Freedom for All to hold our legislators accountable.
We are the only independent newspaper here at USC, run at every level by students. That means we aren’t tied down by any other interests but those of readers like you: the students, faculty, staff and South Central residents that together make up the USC community.
Independence is a double-edged sword: We have a unique lens into the University’s actions and policies, and can hold powerful figures accountable when others cannot. But that also means our budget is severely limited. We’re already spread thin as we compensate the writers, photographers, artists, designers and editors whose incredible work you see in our paper; as we work to revamp and expand our digital presence, we now have additional staff making podcasts, videos, webpages, our first ever magazine and social media content, who are at risk of being unable to receive the support they deserve.
We are therefore indebted to readers like you, who, by supporting us, help keep our paper independent, free and widely accessible.
Please consider supporting us. Even $1 goes a long way in supporting our work; if you are able, you can also support us with monthly, or even annual, donations. Thank you.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept settingsDo Not AcceptWe may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.
If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Google reCaptcha Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:
The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:
