Food Revolution only trying to help LAUSD
Months ago, British celebrity chef Jamie Oliver brought a proposal to the Los Angeles Unified School District. He wanted to shoot the second season of Food Revolution, a show focused on reforming school lunches to be healthier, in Los Angeles schools.
LAUSD said no.
The show is an evolution of Oliver’s British programs such as Jamie’s School Dinners and Jamie’s Ministry of Food, which dealt with repairing unhealthy eating habits at home and at school. Eventually, Oliver decided to create Food Revolution, and traveled to Huntington, West Virginia, an area named “America’s Unhealthiest” by an Associated Press poll.
Oliver worked with the district’s cafeterias to produce fresher, healthier food for students. The kids of the Cabell County Schools, a 12,700-student district in Huntington, didn’t take kindly to Oliver’s new changes at first, but have since grown to enjoy Oliver’s recipes, according to The Huffington Post.
From there, Los Angeles seemed like a logical choice. After all, the city of angels boasts of the nation’s second-largest school district and serves up 1.2 million meals a day.
But LAUSD stopped the Food Revolution crew in its tracks, saying a TV show would be too disruptive.
“We’re interested in Jamie Oliver the food activist, not Jamie the reality TV star,” Robert Alaniz, district spokesman told the Post. “We’ve invited him to work with our menu committee, but there’s too much drama, too much conflict with a reality show.”
The first season of the show was rife with drama and conflict over the poor, under-nutritious food being served to kids in the district and what officials weren’t doing about it.
On second thought, maybe showing the conflict was the whole point. Yes, Oliver’s criticisms had left a bit of a sore spot with Cabell County Schools in West Virginia, and LAUSD would likely have suffered the same bruises to their reputation. But wouldn’t it have been worth it to improve kids’ diets and bring national attention to the issue of quality of school meals?
That question still hangs in the air as LAUSD seemingly continues to keep the cameras, and the public eye, out of its business.
Luckily for Oliver, he was able to film two weeks’ worth of footage at West Adams Preparatory School, which is run by the organization MLA Partner Schools under contract with LAUSD. After two weeks, however, LAUSD found out and, as promised, kicked out Oliver.
Mike McGalliard, the president of MLA Partner schools, wasn’t thrilled about Oliver being kicked out.
“We aren’t happy about it,” McGalliard said. “I told the district, ‘you guys are making a big fuss over nothing. It’s not an expose. It’s an incredible program.’”
According to McGalliard, nearly half of the students at West Adams are obese. This is even more upsetting considering the examples he gave of some of the school’s regular lunches: chicken nuggets and corn dogs, with raw broccoli as a vegetable side.
Raw broccoli? What average schoolkid is going to eat raw broccoli? It’s hard to fathom this is being presented as a healthy meal at one of central L.A.’s better schools.
Although LAUSD has done what it can to promote better eating habits at schools, like banning sodas and junk food, a show like Food Revolution would have done more by offering compromises and solutions to the fundamental problem of creating quality school meals on a budget.
More importantly, the show might have inspired schools, students and parents to start caring more. LAUSD very curiously missed an opportunity to take advantage of a national stage.
No one likes being publicly told they’re doing things wrong and they need to change.
This same issue came up in the first season of the show, of course. Old habits die hard, and the Cabell County School district had issues with Oliver’s techniques, especially when they involved fudging the abysmally-low meal budget. What did this price change entail? For the paying students, it amounted to an increase of 13 cents on average.
LAUSD thinks it has everything under control and there doesn’t need to be embarrassment on TV positive change to effect. But considering the national scale of this problem, the district should have had the cojones to say it could use a fresh, radical perspective.
Doing so on TV would’ve encouraged other districts to face facts about their meals as well. Instead, they kicked, and kept, Oliver out.
Sophia Ruvalcaba, a 17-year-old diabetic student at West Adams Preparatory, said it best:
“He was just trying to make a healthier meal for us.”
Eddie Kim is a sophomore majoring in print journalism. His column, “Food As Life,” runs Thursdays.
The story you linked to was on the Huffington Post website but it was by the Associated Press. I believe all of the quotes and most of the facts here come from that story, so AP should get the credit.
Robert’s right. Reality TV is about ratings more than anything else. Why would the LAUSD want to exploit its students and staff so that “the Naked Chef” can get more advertising dollars?
Correction:
This reporter obviously didn’t do his homework on LAUSD because if he had he would have discovered that LAUSD is already leading the nation in serving healthy and nutritious meals to its students. It has already taken extraordinary steps in banning the sale of sodas and other drinks high in sugar in its schools, banning the sale of junk food, eliminating added trans fats and palm oil, reducing sodium levels and added sugars and increasing access to fresh fruits and vegetables. Additionally the district has been recognized and commended by the federal government as having food nutrition guidelines that far exceed the government’s own guidelines. What’s more legitimate news media are always welcome into LAUSD’s food service areas and many have already covered the district’s food services. Plain and simple district is not interested in reality TV. Too much drama and conflict! Perhaps the reporter is better suited to covering entertainment stories rather than serious stories dealing with food policy.