
One-person play impresses audience
Posted September 28, 2011 at 9:29 pm in Featured, Lifestyle, Theatre
It is not often one gets to witness a one-person show, much less an entertaining one. Nevertheless, despite minor ups and downs, Pigeon, the latest one-woman play by Claudia Stevens, took flight at the Ronald Tutor Ballroom on Tuesday.

Leading lady ¡ With convincing acting and a carefully sculpted dialogue, Claudia Stevens shines in her own mono-character play, giving audience members a unique ride filled with witty remarks and an intriguing agenda. - Photo courtesy of USC Spectrum
The playâs topic is grim, featuring strong indictments of human cruelty to animals, but Stevens, a playwright and actress, has the experience to handle it. A graduate of Vassar College, University of California, Berkeley and Boston University, Stevens studied piano, singing, acting and composing before turning her attention to playwriting. Since then, she has written 15 musical solo plays that have been performed throughout the United States.
Pigeon, her latest creation, follows a lecture of environmental advocate Dame Miriam Rothschild, who, before her advocacy for animal rights, killed and dissected pigeons during World War II. The play poses questions like, âUnder what conditions is it okay to kill animals?â and âIs a human life worth more than an animalâs?â Taking the stage solo, Stevens attempts to answer these questions.
â[The piece] starts with the glories of nature,â Stevens said. âThen we look back and see how dark the story really is.â
Stevens got the inspiration for the play from friends at Cornell University who were familiar with Dame Miriam Rothschild. One of her friends, the late Thomas Eisner, suggested Stevens make her the subject of a play.
âThe Cornell folks, knowing about some of the other things I had done said, âOh, this is something you should look into,ââ Stevens said. âAnd so I did.â
For the most part, the play is strong, and at times, deeply moving. There are moments of potential awkwardness when the music gets too loud or when the audience refuses to respond to Stevensâ questions, but Stevens herself performs well.
Though her acting is convincing, her lines appear too rehearsed at times. She assumes a consistently convincing British accent that never once falters, and adopts the slight stoop of a woman in her seventies, commanding the attention of the audience with her authenticity.
Though she has no one on stage to play off of, Stevens creates her own energy. She calls on audience volunteers, uses a well-crafted score accented with pigeon calls and relies on her own stellar, operatic vibrato to add a musical element to the piece.
In addition to great sound and visual design, the play is well-written. Though it might go over the heads of some unfamiliar with World War II or historical figures of the period just before 1984, the monologue is natural and consistent, keeping with Stevensâ senior-like persona. Stevens has moments when she is haunted, wise and comical; she makes herself a fully developed character.
The play also ensures that the audience, if it was unsympathetic to the cause before, realizes just how sickening animal cruelty can be. Through aptly-timed graphic descriptions, Stevens describes how exactly the pigeons were killed.
According to the play, the âhumaneâ way to kill a pigeon is to separate its head from its spine by putting the birdâs body behind its shoulders and pulling it into two separate directions â that way, the death is purported to be painless.
The pigeon killing was supposed to save the cattle population from disease and, as a result, to save the starving British citizens who were supposedly suffering during the blockade.
âApparently Rothschild was in favor of doing this very quick and painless task,â Stevens said. âBut her conscience was not completely clear. Toward the end of her life, she would never even kill an insect.â
But before the audience feels too distanced, Stevens turns back around and points her finger at the viewers, asking audience members to recall times when they, as children perhaps, were cruel to animals for curiosities sake, to simply see what would happen.
âWe live in a world thatâs not simple,â Stevens said, as Rothschild. âIt is full of contradictions. We are full of contradictions.â
The state of the human versus animal debate today is at the crux of Stevensâ play.
âItâs a mixed picture, but I think we have become more fully human,â Stevens said. âWe donât do wanton killing anymore, but we have to somehow put a brake on ourselves to prevent us from doing truly dreadful things. But there is a possibility in our nature though weâre not over that hill yet.â
Also in the Daily Trojan:
Tags
This article is tagged: animal cruelty, claudia stevens, dame miriam rothschild, pigeon







Recent Comments