Firing of Cruz a step too far by Haden, USC
I never thought I’d see a coach get fired for making his players practice too much.
Wednesday, Feb. 13, 2013 is a day I will never forget.
It was the day that USC baseball coach Frank Cruz had his “contract terminated” for reportedly violating the NCAA’s Countable Athletically Related Activities. For the record, according to the NCAA, here are some of the standards:
– Cannot practice more than four hours a day or 20 hours per week during the season.
– Meetings, practice, film study all count toward the 20 hours
– Required to have at least one day off a week during the season.
– In the offseason, can practice no more than eight hours per week.
Now, listen. I am in no way condoning breaking the rules. I think programs should be run in a clean manner. But to fire a coach for wanting his players to be better? It seems a little excessive.
I understood suspending Cruz. That’s fine. But I think firing Cruz was not the right move. In a culture of sports where performance enhancing drugs, paying recruits and sex scandals seem to be the norm, I think there has to be a line drawn when someone deserves to be fired and when they don’t. We’re treating practicing in the same manner as sex scandals.
A coach deserves to lose his or her job when he or she puts players in a position to be injured, either mentally or physically. If this was situation like the one that happened recently at Washington State with Mike Leach, I could understand Pat Haden taking the action that he did. Leach reportedly held practices that not only lasted too long, but essentially hazed players by shooting cold water at them and making them practice in freezing conditions in the sand. That is grounds for firing, and he still has a job, somehow.
It’s not fair to completely come down on Haden and the athletic department quite yet. We don’t know all the facts — there could very easily be something that comes out later. But unless Cruz was firing industrial power water hoses at players at 6 a.m., this was not the right move for USC. And not just for the baseball team, for the entire athletic department.
Men’s basketball coach Kevin O’Neill was fired just a few months ago for poor performance. Honestly, I would have been okay if Cruz had been fired for his less than stellar record while coaching the Trojans, but that wasn’t the reason we were given.
The Twitterverse was in disbelief yesterday, referring to USC as somewhat of an unstable situation, having lost two major coaches recently. This is not the reputation it needs right now. The school is still getting over the Reggie Bush disaster. USC became “the school that cheats.” Now, it’s the school that can’t decide who to keep as coach. A lack of stability in the football program doomed a once-promising 2013 recruiting class for Lane Kiffin. A lack of stability is bound to doom the other two programs, too, especially since the baseball season starts Friday.
Haden has an obligation to self-sanction his programs, especially in the wake of the current football sanctions, but this seems a step too far. There is no way programs are going to survive if coaches get canned right before a season starts for breaking rules on practice times. That just doesn’t seem right.
How, as a player, are you supposed to give it your all when the man in charge of your program was fired? This can’t bode well for the team, no matter how admirably interim head coach Dan Stubbs fills in. The USC athletic department, regardless of policing itself in the wake of previous scandals, is not doing itself favors at this point in time.
Coaches deserve to be fired quite frequently, and normally it is warranted. Poor performance and sketchy practices are reasons to fire someone. But when a coach makes players practice more than they are supposed to? That deserves a slap on the wrist. Cruz did not endanger players by making them practice or holding too many meetings. He simply wanted to get the most out of his players. That doesn’t really strike me as a fireable offense.
“Goal Line Stand” runs Fridays. To comment on this story, email Michael Katz at [email protected] or visit dailytrojan.com.
It seems like a suspension might have been in order for Cruz and USC Baseball as opposed to termination. But in the case of football…when are we going to get back to “USC Caliber” coaching? Seems like even in our current state, we should be able to attract a coach that meets the standards we have had in place for the past 75 or more years.
From what I understand, Cruz has more integrity in his toenail than Lane Kiffin…..at least Cruz can sleep well at night.
Michael Katz. How clueless are you? Cruz was not fired for wanting his players to be better. He was fired for breaking a critical rule. Sure, wanting his players to be better may have been what drove him to break rules, but that is not why he was fired. Get your facts straight.
Also – Dan Hubbs was not named an interim head coach. He was elevated directly to head coach of this program. Stop your rant and make sure you get your facts right before you keep spewing this nonsense.
Another insignificant move by Haden. He was trying to redeem himself for making Cruz the head coach
w/o a national search for someone who could get this program back to creditability. This was his opportunity
when something happened to give him an excuse to make a bold move. The athletic dept. has become a
source of incompetence lately.
Right now USC has a reputation for not following rules. I can understand why he was fired. If you need to change the perception of your athletic program you need to be strict in handling violations
With all the crippling sanctions that NCAA handed down for the Football Program, actually keeping Excellent Students from obtaining Scolarships, what would they do with the Frank Cruz problem.
The Football Scolarships were disallowed to folks who had notheing to do with the problem.
Not excessive at all. Message had already been clear to all coaches. Follow the rules, period!