LAW & DISORDER
Shutdowns are for toddler tantrums, not Congress
It’s time for the U.S. government to grow up, play nice and do their jobs.
It’s time for the U.S. government to grow up, play nice and do their jobs.
Oct. 1 doesn’t mean much to me other than the midway point through the semester and the looming threat of midterms, but for the United States Congress, it’s a date they cannot afford to forget.
For better or for worse, Congress is in charge of the government’s budgeting and with that comes passing 12 annual appropriation bills that fund government agencies by Oct. 1. Now, for us silly, forgetful college students, when we miss a deadline, the worst that might happen is a few points off our grade or, if it’s a bill, some accrued interest. For Congress, missing that deadline means a government shutdown.
During a shutdown, federal agencies don’t receive any funding, employees have to work without pay and can’t do anything about it until Congress approves their funding. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the five-week partial government shutdown in 2018-19 reduced economic output by $11 billion and the 2013 full government shutdown reduced GDP growth by $20 billion.
Now here’s the kicker: While public servants working to make ends meet are forced to wait indefinitely for their paychecks, members of Congress — who are causing the problem — still get paid.
If there’s one thing the U.S. excels at, it’s hypocrisy. You should face the consequences of your own actions, simple as that. But for some sick twisted reason, when Congress misses its own deadline, the ones who suffer are the citizens and country it’s supposed to be looking out for.
This all goes back to the Antideficiency Act that was passed in 1884, which prohibits federal agencies from spending any money without approval from Congress. However, this wasn’t always the case. Originally, the law just banned the government from signing contracts without Congress’ approval.
According to BBC writers Robin Levinson King and Anthony Zurcher, “for almost a century, if there was a gap in budgets, the government had allowed necessary spending to continue.” But, after a narrow interpretation amended into the law under President Jimmy Carter’s administration, in 1980, “the government took a much stricter view: no budget, no spending.”
If this sounds a bit extreme, it is. Above all else, it’s a choice, and one of the most ignorant ones Congress can make as it usually occurs when members of Congress decide that politics are more important than people and they can’t put differences aside to agree on a plan. The big disagreement that nearly shut down the government this year was due to conservative demands for deeper spending cuts in the House despite an initial agreement set back in May.
Foreign Policy writer Joshua Keating explains that having a government so deadlocked in budgeting disagreements that it stops working is, unfortunately, a U.S. specialty — other countries are pale in comparison.
“In a parliamentary system, used by the vast majority of democracies in Europe and Asia, the budget process is similar on paper: The prime minister prepares a ‘government budget’ and submits it to parliament for a vote. But if parliament rejects that budget, that’s generally considered a sign that the government no longer has the confidence of parliament and has to resign,” Keating writes.
That’s not to say other countries don’t encounter budgeting issues.
In 2007, Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva’s spending plans were rejected by Congress and the fiscal year began without a budget. Sweden faced the same problem in 2014 when its left-of-center minority government lost the budget vote. But no matter how severe the disagreements were, the government continued to fulfill its duties as usual.
Writing about the U.S. government shutdown in 2013, Anthony Zurcher at BBC News stated, “for most of the world, a government shutdown is very bad news — the result of revolution, invasion, or disaster. [But] even in the middle of its ongoing civil war, the Syrian government has continued to pay its bills and workers’ wages.”
While the separation of powers is one of the U.S. government’s few noteworthy features, checks and balances should not get in the way of citizens’ ability to feed their families and live their lives. The political divide in this country continues to drag us into pits of despair. It’s not too late to pull ourselves out though. Whether or not Congress will by their new deadline of Nov. 17 is up to them.
Helen Nguyen is a graduate student writing about law and social issues in her column, “Law & Disorder.” Her column, “Law and Disorder,” runs every other Wednesday.
We are the only independent newspaper here at USC, run at every level by students. That means we aren’t tied down by any other interests but those of readers like you: the students, faculty, staff and South Central residents that together make up the USC community.
Independence is a double-edged sword: We have a unique lens into the University’s actions and policies, and can hold powerful figures accountable when others cannot. But that also means our budget is severely limited. We’re already spread thin as we compensate the writers, photographers, artists, designers and editors whose incredible work you see in our daily paper; as we work to revamp and expand our digital presence, we now have additional staff making podcasts, videos, webpages, our first ever magazine and social media content, who are at risk of being unable to receive the compensation they deserve.
We are therefore indebted to readers like you, who, by supporting us, help keep our paper daily (we are the only remaining college paper on the West Coast that prints every single weekday), independent, free and widely accessible.
Please consider supporting us. Even $1 goes a long way in supporting our work; if you are able, you can also support us with monthly, or even annual, donations. Thank you.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.
If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Google reCaptcha Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:
The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them: