Is it overly sexual, or is it just queer?
Criticisms of queer films are often homophobic rather than legitimate.
Criticisms of queer films are often homophobic rather than legitimate.
A churro. A peach. A tall glass of milk. The Jacob Elordi bathwater candle. These are some of the items from the recent “freakiest” films people have ever seen, and most of these movies feature queer themes. Sex positivity in the media has come a long way over the years, as has LGBTQIA+ representation so it would seem as though modern society is not as conservative as we used to be.
This, however, isn’t the truth. Conversations about sex are still whispered behind closed doors, especially for the LGBTQIA+ community.
A 2021 article in the Harvard Kennedy School’s Student Policy Review on limitations of intimacy for queer couples found that “participants reported distress about being specifically watched (i.e., surveilled) not only when existing generally but especially when with a partner.”
Although progress has been made with the creation of more queer-targeted media, we as a society are far from having normalized queer intimacy. In fact, we’ve yet to normalize sex at all.
In December, A24 debuted the controversial film “Babygirl” (2024) starring Harris Dickinson and Nicole Kidman. But there was a greater uproar over Drew Starkey getting hot and heavy with Daniel Craig in “Queer” (2024) than Dickinson watching Kidman lap up milk out of a bowl like a cat.
Like with “Queer,” many viewers were also appalled by the peach scene in “Call Me by Your Name” (2017) wherein Timothée Chalamet’s character Elio penetrates the fruit bitten by his romantic interest, Oliver (Armie Hammer), in a moment of vulnerability and lust, as well as by Oliver (Barry Keoghan) drinking Felix’s (Jacob Elordi) bathwater in “Saltburn” (2023).
Although these scenes were definitely shocking and unusual — even I can admit they were a bit crazy — from the uproar of audience reactions, you’d think these movies contained the most graphic, grotesque sex acts you’d ever seen in your entire life.
Since the rise in social media, “sex positivity” — defined by the BBC as “openness to a variety of sexual orientations, interests (or lack thereof), identities and expressions” — has been better promoted and more widespread. However, for a term that’s meant to refer to all communities, sex-positive viewers seem to falter with queer media.
At times, queer representation has shown its flaws.
A National Collegiate Honors Council journal regarding LGBTQIA+ representation in entertainment explains, “Out of the many tropes that exist in the entertainment world, the most significant and damaging are queerness being synonymous with or caused by mental illness, queer people being sexually or morally perverse, and the Bury Your Gays cliche.” But even with more normalized depictions, the stigmatization remains in audience reactions.
Yes, it was a bit shocking to watch Mike Faist and Josh O’Connor make out while Zendaya sat back and watched in “Challengers” (2024). But based on TikTok reactions and vague comments, I was prepared to shield my poor eyes from the most intense profanity while sitting in the theater. Instead, I was graced with one of the best and arguably Oscar-snubbed movies of the year while the freakiest part of the movie was Faist’s moan every time he hit a tennis ball.
Audience reactions seem completely different when it comes to heterosexual media about sex and sexuality compared to queer sex and sexuality.
The same middle-aged women who are appalled by two men kissing in “Brokeback Mountain” (2005) are likely grinning ear to ear during all three “Fifty Shades of Grey” movies. Too many people were excited by the supposedly sexy idea of a man kidnapping a woman and keeping her for a year in “365 Days” (2020), yet viewers deem portrayals of queer couples — even without kidnapping plots — as “predatory.”
When a man and a woman have sex in a movie or TV show, we call it what it is: a sex scene. But, when a gay couple has sex in a movie, it becomes porn.
This is not to say that some of the recently released movies don’t use intentional “shock factor” or are the best pieces ever created. Sexuality is fluid and complex. You’re not going to like everything, and that’s okay. But before you give a scathing review about how unnecessarily and overly sexual a queer film was, consider this: was it the sex that made you uncomfortable — or the sexuality of the people involved?
Sex is an awkward topic that not everyone is ready to take. You’re not a prude for wanting to stray away from it and you’re not a pervert for being drawn to it. However, we must learn to recognize when our criticisms are based on genuine disagreement with representations of sex or when they are a result of discomfort with the representations of queer sexuality.
If these biases are influencing us, we must hold ourselves accountable to grow from our mistakes and create media spaces that are more accepting of LGBTQIA+ relationships and sexuality.
We are the only independent newspaper here at USC, run at every level by students. That means we aren’t tied down by any other interests but those of readers like you: the students, faculty, staff and South Central residents that together make up the USC community.
Independence is a double-edged sword: We have a unique lens into the University’s actions and policies, and can hold powerful figures accountable when others cannot. But that also means our budget is severely limited. We’re already spread thin as we compensate the writers, photographers, artists, designers and editors whose incredible work you see in our paper; as we work to revamp and expand our digital presence, we now have additional staff making podcasts, videos, webpages, our first ever magazine and social media content, who are at risk of being unable to receive the support they deserve.
We are therefore indebted to readers like you, who, by supporting us, help keep our paper independent, free and widely accessible.
Please consider supporting us. Even $1 goes a long way in supporting our work; if you are able, you can also support us with monthly, or even annual, donations. Thank you.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept settingsDo Not AcceptWe may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.
If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Google reCaptcha Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:
The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them: