Postdocs rally before convocation to ‘gain visibility’
The University said it will continue negotiating in “good faith” for the union’s first contract.
The University said it will continue negotiating in “good faith” for the union’s first contract.

Just outside New Student Convocation on Thursday morning, roughly 20 individuals advocating for USC’s union of postdoctoral scholars passed out flyers and talked to incoming students about the University’s proposed policy regarding harassment reporting in an effort to raise awareness of the union’s negotiations for its first contract.
USC Researchers and Fellows United – United Auto Workers is pushing for a process that doesn’t solely go through USC’s Office of Civil Rights Compliance — formerly known as the Office for Equity, Equal Opportunity, and Title IX — and uses an independent arbitrator so they will have “enforceable protections,” according to Priscilla Chan, a member of the union’s bargaining team and a postdoctoral researcher at Keck School of Medicine of USC.
“USC will dictate the entire process, and whatever the outcome is, we have to accept it,” Chan said about the University’s proposal. “What we want is the ability to file grievances so that we can essentially appeal this initial decision and postdocs who are victims of harassment and discrimination have more of a say on the outcome of their situation.”
Chan said USC’s graduate student worker union previously bargained for a similar process that includes an independent arbitrator, but the policy has been more difficult to get for postdocs due to the University classifying graduate workers as students and postdocs as staff.
The University stood by its policy in a statement to the Daily Trojan and wrote that it will continue to negotiate in “good faith” with postdocs.
“Our existing compliance policies and processes, including those specifically addressing all forms of discrimination or harassment, are best in class,” the statement read. “Those policies are mandated by federal law, were developed in consultation with the country’s leading experts and work to protect all members of our community.”
URFU-UAW chose to rally before convocation to “gain visibility” for their issues as a union representing roughly 400, Chan said. The union formed on June 21, 2024 but has yet to negotiate a contract with USC.
“Postdocs are largely separated from undergrads as well as their parents, so we don’t get as much exposure,” Chan said about why the rally was held near convocation. “Discrimination and harassment are issues that affect all students, universally, and we hope that we can bring more awareness to these issues.”
Among the roughly 20 attendees of Thursday’s rally were members of URFU-UAW as well as supporters from the graduate student and School of Cinematic Arts adjunct faculty unions, as well as the proposed union of most research, training, practitioner and clinical-track faculty at USC.
In a joint Instagram post on Tuesday, the four groups announced a follow-up rally called “Fair USC Now” that will take place on Sept. 3. The post called for fair contracts for all of the unions and the University to recognize the proposed RTPC union, United Faculty – United Auto Workers, which has been waiting for a National Labor Relations Board decision after USC challenged their unionization effort in January.
At two recent bargaining sessions on Aug. 13 and Aug. 20, URFU-UAW and USC came to two tentative agreements regarding union membership and its relationship with the University, meaning they have now agreed on 20 of 32 articles, according to the union’s bargaining tracker.
While the union previously expressed frustration with the pace of bargaining, USC made a sweeping “comprehensive proposal” on Aug. 13, leaving the union with 11 articles to respond to while the University has one.
Chan said “there will definitely be more actions” following the Sept. 3 rally, but the union has not decided on what that may look like. She said they will reevaluate the possibility of future actions after the rally and a bargaining session next week.
We are the only independent newspaper here at USC, run at every level by students. That means we aren’t tied down by any other interests but those of readers like you: the students, faculty, staff and South Central residents that together make up the USC community.
Independence is a double-edged sword: We have a unique lens into the University’s actions and policies, and can hold powerful figures accountable when others cannot. But that also means our budget is severely limited. We’re already spread thin as we compensate the writers, photographers, artists, designers and editors whose incredible work you see in our paper; as we work to revamp and expand our digital presence, we now have additional staff making podcasts, videos, webpages, our first ever magazine and social media content, who are at risk of being unable to receive the support they deserve.
We are therefore indebted to readers like you, who, by supporting us, help keep our paper independent, free and widely accessible.
Please consider supporting us. Even $1 goes a long way in supporting our work; if you are able, you can also support us with monthly, or even annual, donations. Thank you.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Accept settingsDo Not AcceptWe may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.
If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Google reCaptcha Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:
The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:
