Major-shaming ignores hardworking students
When I checked communication when applying to USC, I had no idea the stigma that would be attached to my major for the entirety of my undergraduate years. In case you have not heard, communication is a “joke” major — it is where you will find the most athletes and stereotypical sorority girls, so they say.
I have even had some of my closest friends approach me when I am studying and say, “What are you doing? Communication majors don’t study.”
Despite the countless times I have resented my communication major for the stigma attached to it, constantly playing with the idea of switching majors, I find myself, four years later, defending the communication major and what it stands for. In my four years at USC — do not be too shocked — I have, in fact, studied. I have pulled all-nighters and been stressed to the point of panic. But that’s not the point.
The point is that I chose to be a communication major because it coincided with my passions and career goals. For those of you who do not know, communication “explores the social, political and cultural functions of communication as it occurs in diverse settings ranging from interpersonal interaction to global media,” according to Northwestern University. There’s a lot you can do with a communication major, which is perfect for someone like me who knows a general area of interest, but would like the opportunity to pursue various career niches and areas of study.
Perhaps the most frustrating part of being a communication major — or I suppose any liberal arts major — is having other majors look down on you, like your field of study is trivial in a university flooding with pre-med students and future engineers. What irritates me most is the fact that with that comes the presumption that I am not smart. I am smart, and I could have been a physicist, a doctor or a lawyer. However, I did not want to do that because it wouldn’t make me happy; I want to tell stories, whether by means of journalism, creative writing, film or television.
I could not help but draw comparisons between the problem of major-shaming to a column in Glamour Magazine by Girls actress Zosia Mamet. Mamet wrote about the problem with many people’s perceptions of feminism because women become obsessed with “making it” and going for the gold, that they start looking down on someone if they simply follow their passions, even if those passions do not include becoming the head of a company or running the world Beyoncé-style.
In the article, Mamet writes, “I hate that we look at women who choose not to run a country as having given up.” Similarly, I hate when college students judge another student who has decided to not focus on curing cancer or going to the moon as lazy, unintelligent or incapable. Just like with feminism, the freedom to choose a way of life is not about choosing the “most prestigious” option, but rather, pursuing what makes us happy without judgment from our peers.
This is not a sad attempt to defend my decision to major in communication, but rather, a request for students to stop condescendingly criticizing other people’s majors. By looking down on someone’s field of study, students are undermining the value of personal choice in the process of deciding college majors.
I have no doubt that there are USC students who have chosen communication because it is “easier” than pre-med, and I have no doubt that there are students in the major that slack off and get by easily. However, it is ignorant to judge the whole undergraduate population with those standards — to ignore those who work hard, study late, memorize often and take on extracurricular internships and jobs to gain real-life experience.
Because those people exist and they work hard, and despite how many times you think you are just “joking” with your liberal arts friends, you could really be making them question their decision to follow their interests and passions.
In her Glamour column, Mamet writes, “The solution … is to ask ourselves what we actually want — each of us personally — and stop putting so much pressure on one another. Success isn’t about winning everything; it’s about achieving your dream, be that teaching middle school or flying jets” — or majoring in communication.
Mollie Berg is a senior majoring in communication. Her column, “All in a Day’s Work,” ran every other Wednesday.

Who was more of a genius: Mozart, Newton, Shakespeare, Keynes? The field of communications is as rigorous as you make it. And education shouldn’t be entirely instrumental in terms of getting a job. Do well in schools, learn some skills, do impressive extracurriculars etc and you’ll do fine. You never get a chance to do undergrad twice and studying something that you are passionate about is far more important than slugging through some subject that does not inspire you.
And everything you say is arbitrary to you.
Education is important. But pragmatically speaking, you got to earn a living with that degree that will cost you a lot of money (undergrad and grad school). What you say is “feel good,” cheesy, and worse of all, cliche; it lacks substance and pragmatism.
I have very much experienced the job market. I used my non-STEM degree to get a very well-paying corporate job. The job is rather soulless but it pays extremely well. I guess that’s how you’d advise all young people to live their lives….
I don’t knock on those majoring in non-STEM. But if you’re going to brag about attending a “prestigious school with a highly selective admission rate, yada yada yada…” then you better be able to live up to that hype. A vast majority of non-STEM, business, humanities majors, and the like CANNOT find white collar jobs after graduating. USC and many other universities are hoping you’re oblivious to this. Furthermore, my friends who attended that school across town, here, and other places….who majored in SOFT degrees, went to not-so-prestigious law schools, and they’ve amassed $150K+ in debt, while only able to find $40Kish/yr. jobs. Owhhhh, so glamorous….One of them can’t find a job despite fervid efforts.
Better be careful about the choices you make in life.
You seem to be a bit ignorant of some non-stem degrees. I agree that some non-stem majors are very easy (com), and not things really worth studying. But some non-stem degrees (philosophy in particular) score better on standardized tests (LSAT, GRE, GMAT) than pretty much all stem majors except physics. Also philosophy majors have high mid-career median salaries than many stem majors. You should be careful to not over generalize.
You seem offended. And just because you assert it, doesn’t mean it’s true. No credible citations and just your opinions don’t mean it’s true. Funny how you left out the MCAT which is replete with bio sciences, general sciences, math, and English sections.
Sorry, didn’t mean to offend you. Why don’ t you philosphize that?
This is not a smart reply to an empirically true riposte to your original argument. Booby wins this one, I am afraid.
Oh geez, I was looking for your approbation *sarcasm if your “critical thinking” skills didn’t pick that up*. What’s empirical about what Booby asserted? No credible source.
It’s pathetic that you give yourself a “thumbs up” in nearly all your own comments. I guess like that saying goes, “It doesn’t matter what others think.” You obviously are an insecure individual.
None that he stated in terms of sources, but plenty if you google. Learn those research skills you possibly learned in college. Or can you only research engineering subjects? Is it pathetic? It amused me so I did it to rile people like you. Seemed to work. Tell you what: you are wrong on this topic and something you’d learn if you took pyschology is cognitive dissonance. People tend to screen out information that doesn’t fit their priors. It takes a big man- and a superior intellect- to admit when they are wrong and update their opinions. We’ll see whether you have it in you.
Since you’re a “big man,” I”m awaiting your apology owed to me;)
…When you assert something in a debate, the onus is on you to prove it. You must provide the sources.
There are no rules on Daily Trojan comments ‘debates”. Google it rather than flail around. He’s right, you’re wrong. I AM sorry if you are too devoid of character to simply admit when you’ve made a mistake.
This is not true. Any employer who doesn’t realize that they are employing someone who needs to think critically and has to absorb lots of new information- and thinks that the content of your undergraduate degree means anything- is not an employer that you want to work for. At undergrad you are learning to think critically, tackle and synthesize new information, and learning intellectual skills that you take with you. This can be learned just as well in English literature as it can in engineering. If anything, some employers might worry about the soft skills of the latter.
Do what you are intellectually passionate about and show leadership in your extracurriculars. Everything else will work out.
WRIT 140 teaches you fallacious arguments e.g. strawman, slippery slope, begging the question, et al. You make too big of deal about how “rigorous” it is; it’s not.
Everyone takes a writing class. And plenty of non-STEM classes are rigorous. What an odd response.
A majority of communications majors, from freshmen to senior year, only step foot on campus 2 or 3 days a week.
A 4 units class in COMM is basically 4 hours a week. A 4 unit class in BISC or CHEM is 3 hours of lecture a week, 3 hours of lab, and 5 semester hours of testing. I know many of COMM majors that are partying their way through USC. The Biology, Chemistry, or Engineering students I know that started off partying are now “Health Promotions” or “Business” students.
Anecdote is not the singular of data.
Who are you to assert that what Concerned Trojan wrote is anecdotal? Do you always use ad hominem attacks? You are thin skinned. That’s not how you win arguments. But more importantly, win them over. You’re more about winning a pissing contest that presenting logical argument. You are a bitter individual.
Complaining about an ad hominem attack (which it wasn’t) while making an ad hominem attack…. This is why critical thinking skills are more important than some STEM degree that any employer who interviews won’t be impressed by.
Yeah sure *sarcastically.* I’ll take the high road by acquiescing to your drivel.
You win, hahaha!
It’s sweet of you to say it, but I already knew that was true.
Right, you knew all along that everything you said is drivel.
You’re such a pansy. You’re vindictive and bitter.
Says the man who keeps responding with insults rather than argument. Listen, I know that some smaller people, when called out on being assertively wrong on a topic, tend to lash out at the person who corrects them. However, those of us with character tend to know that we can be wrong about all kinds of things. Or rather, rather like in the philosophy of science, we can only be right *for now*. This creates a kind of radical humility. If I am wrong, I say “how interesting”. I don’t have a fit like a toddler. I don’t know if this is emotional for you- perhaps you did sociology or something and failed to land a job and you’ve come in like Back to the Future to warn your younger self- but better to be rational. You’re wrong. It happens. Now you know and you won’t be. Doesn’t that feel good down there somewhere? I hope you have a blessed day.
Haha, communications is a joke!….J/K.
You bring up some valid points. Most people don’t make it to med school, so when they thump their chests about being a bio-chem major I take them lightly. Most of them don’t thump their chest however, because the classes they take are HARD, and when you’re struggling to compete in them, you don’t have extra energy to brag about anything.