What should the university’s approach to security be?

The last year at USC has been marked by two major violent crimes: the tragic killings of two graduate students in April and the shooting on Halloween night.

Christina Ellis | Daily Trojan

USC was also marked by increased security measures, both on and off campus. The Los Angeles Police Department added extra patrols in addition to 30 officers, a detective and a neighborhood prosecutor to the USC area in April. The week after the Halloween shooting, President C. L. Max Nikias announced various new security measures that would be put in place in the upcoming spring semester, ranging from restricting campus access from 9 p.m. to 6 a.m. to checking all IDs after 9 p.m. and installing additional security cameras at entrances and around the perimeter of campus.

These are all commendable efforts, but are responses to the most visible — and arguably the most aberrational — incidents of crime at USC. But they put an unnecessary spotlight on isolated incidents caused by individual decisions that are out of the university’s control, and as a consequence, launch the university down a slippery slope of overdone, stringent security measures.

The univeristy must react to crime-related incidents, no matter how isolated they are. But it also must work to strike a blance between immediately amping up university security and finding long-term solutions to issues of crime and safety.

The fatal shooting of Ying Wu and Ming Qu in April dealt a shocking and heartbreaking blow to the USC community. The university responded appropriately by increasing the number of “yellow jackets” in the area surrounding campus who are equipped with radios so they can immediately contact DPS or LAPD. LAPD’s increased presence also helped assuage the fears of students, parents, faculty and staff that a similar incident could happen again.

After the Halloween shooting, Nikias immediately reformed the university’s policy on events, banning the use of any outside promoters for events on campus or on The Row and making clear that the process to get events approved would be a difficult one. These kinds of events receive the most visibility, attention and criticism from inside and outside the USC community, and as a result, the strong action taken by the university was warranted.

But what’s lost in all the media coverage and heightened visibility about the danger surrounding USC is that both the shootings were caused by individuals unaffiliated with the university, who made decisions completely out of the university’s control. How much can new security measures really do to prevent the unpredictable decisions of individuals?

This is not to say that all attempts at improving security should be abandoned because so much is out of the university’s control. But there are only so many truly effective measures USC can implement, and if we continue at the rate we are going, such measures will become increasingly ineffective and superfluous. It also sets a dangerous precedent when concerned parents and families, who are removed from USC and — for the most part — only hear about these isolated incidents, are clamoring for the university to better protect their children. What if enough parents signed a petition pressuring Nikias to make USC a closed campus and he agreed? Such a change would be irreversibly detrimental to students and faculty, as well as to the valuable relationship the university has built with the surrounding community.

When it comes to the issue of crime and safety at USC, the balance between taking immediate action and making long-term foundational changes is difficult to find but absolutely necessary. But moving forward into next semester and the years to come, it is crucial for the university to remember this and to not get caught up in the immediacy of making more and more security changes.

Elena Kadvany is a senior majoring in Spanish and is the Daily Trojan’s Editorial Director. Point/Counterpoint ran Fridays.


USC has seen some troubling safety issues in the last year. With the killings of Ying Wu and Ming Qu in April and the shooting on Halloween, students, parents, alumni and staff all have reason for concern.

These events have prompted the university administration to increase campus security, but so far these changes have received a substantial amount of criticism. From inaccurate Trojans Alerts to plans to check IDs at every dorm entrance, the impact of these changes has largely been perceived as negative. Just because a crime hasn’t been stopped and students have been inconvenienced, however, doesn’t mean the new safety measures aren’t effective. They are the university’s best option to keep students safe and protect its own interests, and they must be enforced.

Whether students, faculty or staff like the new safety policies or not, they make sense. The university can’t force students to be safe; all they can do is try to keep campus as secure as possible, and for the most part the changes — Security Ambassadors, or yellow jackets, ID checks after 9 p.m. and additional security cameras, to name a few — should achieve that.

It’s not like the USC administration has a choice in enacting them. No matter how much students criticize the new safety measures, it’s nothing compared to the flak the administration would have received if it had done nothing. Parents, alumni and students all expected to see action from the university in response to the Halloween and April shootings. The university doesn’t want to inconvenience students, but ensuring their safety remains a top priority.

Some students have said that because the shootings were isolated incidents caused by people outside the university, there is no heightened safety risk for students. USC, however, is becoming more and more connected to the surrounding community — students can’t think of activity within that community as independent of university life any more. There are certain realities that come with living in a city as large as Los Angeles, and the frequency of incidents in the past year has made it clear that USC will continue to be affected by safety problems if changes aren’t made.

These changes, however, still need to be carefully considered and reviewed. USC must focus on providing appropriate, rather than invasive or overbearing, protection to its students and faculty. The impact of the policy that requires students to show IDs after 9 p.m., for example, remains to be seen as it will be implemented in the spring semester; if it ends up being too inconvenient, it should be reconsidered. But for now, the USC community needs to remember it has been affected by not one, but two shooting incidents in the last year. Until the university can determine more effective long-term solutions to safety problems in the community, it is better to err on the side of caution.

Solutions to such a serious problem will inevitably have drawbacks, and since it is difficult to measure improved security. the benefits aren’t always easy to see. Rather than flat-out rejecting new security measures, however, students, faculty and staff should give them a chance to improve security first.

Just because the new policies aren’t perfect does not mean they aren’t worth enforcing — and their enforcement is crucial to protecting the university community.


Burke Gibson is a sophomore majoring in economics and is the Daily Trojan’s Chief Copy Editor.

Point/Counterpoint ran Fridays.

12 replies
  1. North University Park
    North University Park says:

    For sure the securest place on campus.

    USC’s University Club (only faculty and staff can become members) has gotten a new home at King Stoops Hall, which started life in 1923 as a Los Angeles public library (and was a USC library for decades too). Perkins+Will designed the adaptive reuse project, adding an addition and creating “a main dining room that serves as the building’s showpiece, modern kitchen, private rooms, a lounge, bar, and second floor banquet area,” as well as a patio, according to a press release. Meanwhile, the old central library area has been opened up to focus on the cathedral ceiling and windows. The University Club used to be located in an old mid-century modern building at the south end of campus, but the press release notes that the new building is “at the heart of a campus that is expanding northward.”

    • North University Park
      North University Park says:

      I have gotten really good at cut and paste.

      For those that don’t know:

      “How to Cut, Copy, and Paste in Windows

      You can cut, copy, and paste in Windows to move items or copies of items to other locations within a file, or to a different file or application. Using the cut, copy, and paste features allows you to organize the items within your files quicker and easier, and Windows makes cutting, copying, and pasting easy by giving you a few simple steps to get the job done.

      1 Select the text or object you want to work with.

      Do so by clicking and dragging across the text that you want to work with or by clicking an object to select it.

      2 Copy or Cut the item.

      If you want to copy the item so that it remains in its current location, choose Edit→Copy, which makes a copy of the item to place elsewhere. Or you can choose Edit→Cut to remove the selected item from its present location and place it elsewhere.

      3 Choose Edit→Paste.

      Move your cursor to the location (in the current document, another document, or another application) where you want to place the item; choosing Edit→Paste places the item at that location.”

      Most applications also offer toolbar buttons for Cut, Copy, and Paste, as well as keyboard shortcuts. The common keyboard shortcuts are: Cut, Ctrl+X; Copy, Ctrl+C; and Paste, Ctrl+V.

      One slick feature of Microsoft applications is Paste Special. This displays a smart tag icon when you paste an item. If you click this icon, you get some choices about whether you retain formatting from the original item or assume the formatting of the location where you’re pasting it.”

      If only I could get that damn cell phone to work properly.

  2. SC Alum '12
    SC Alum '12 says:

    “What if enough parents signed a petition pressuring Nikias to make USC a closed campus and he agreed? Such a change would be irreversibly detrimental to students and faculty, as well as to the valuable relationship the university has built with the surrounding community.”

    Get it through your head sweetheart, once and for all. There is ZERO valuable relationship between the university and the community:

    USC Contribution to Community:

    1. Job Opportunities
    2. Infrastructure Development
    3. Local Investment
    4. Community Service Programs (e.g. JEP)

    Community Contribution to USC

    1. Mugging Students (or stabbing them if they attempt to retain their possessions)
    2. Molesting/Trying to Rape Students
    3. Stealing Student Bicycles
    4. Vandalizing and Loitering
    5. Stealing Unattended Property and breaking into cars
    6. Shooting at each other with students in the vicinity

    There’s a clear definition for such a relationship, and you’ll find it in any high-school biology book. It’s called parasitism. Our so-called “community” are a bunch of disgraceful leeches who only detract from the amazing USC experience. Closing our campus will lose nothing, and gain everything.

  3. North University Park
    North University Park says:

    The problem starts and ends with the Row! Close that place down so I can get some sleep. Noise keeps all my kitties up as well!

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. […] Read the full article here: What should the university’s approach to security be? | Daily Trojan […]

Comments are closed.